
How social media impact on strategy
147
Using techniques that are freely available, we are now beginning to under-
stand what interests publics about organizations and what they think about 
them, from what is explicitly wri�en and said about them online.
  Even those sections of the population that never use the internet are in-
fluenced by it,  albeit  at one step removed. They can also  influence  those 
who are online, and the ‘have nots’ do have online advocates.
  As a lot of information is user generated, this brings a symmetry in com-
munication that influences both organizations and their publics. Here we 
have the unusual phenomenon of engagement by proxy, where individuals 
a�empt to engage directly with both the organization and those believed to 
be able to influence it.
  As  argued  earlier,  the  cherished  (if  flawed)  belief  that  messages  can 
be  ‘controlled’  is  largely  a  thing  of  the  past.  There  is inherent  agency  in 
and of the internet, where messages are changed by human and machine 
interventions as they hop from platform to platform, channel to channel. 
An organization  now  competes  with  a  wide  range of other actors in  the 
development and dissemination of information, inexorably contributing to 
what now becomes the development of value systems, across a network of 
authors, platforms and channels. We deal with this in detail in Chapter 17.
  Because internet users are now also contributors, they cast searing ‘net-
shine’ deep into organizations that are increasingly transparent – whether 
they like it or not.  These  new  critics have the  tools  –  and the inclination 
– to explore what organizations represent, do and say. With their enhanced 
access to online content from sources like governments, ombudsmen and 
regulators, and trade associations, and the comments of the wider online 
and offline community, ordinary people can question the values and value 
systems of organizations. And they pose – and answer – these questions in 
public, on blogs and social networking sites, through wikis, podcasts and 
YouTube videos.
  Organizations have to be able to defend their values in public like never 
before. Spin, bling, hype and exaggeration as well as ethics and practices 
will be questioned and challenged, and any dissonance between the values 
of users and the organization is made very publicly evident (see Chapter 26).
  In developing communications strategies at a corporate level, it is evident 
that there is an online view available from online interactions that also affect 
brand and other  reputations. The manifestation  and changed behaviours 
are not always evident from simple cause and effect analysis. They are the 
accumulation of small ‘straws in the wind’ blown through cyberspace.
NOT WAVING, DROWNING. . .
This  sea,  this  universe  of  information,  has  a  downside.  There  is  just  too 
much of it. The sheer volume of ‘facts’ and messages means all players must