How social media impact on strategy
147
Using techniques that are freely available, we are now beginning to under-
stand what interests publics about organizations and what they think about
them, from what is explicitly wri�en and said about them online.
Even those sections of the population that never use the internet are in-
fluenced by it, albeit at one step removed. They can also influence those
who are online, and the ‘have nots’ do have online advocates.
As a lot of information is user generated, this brings a symmetry in com-
munication that influences both organizations and their publics. Here we
have the unusual phenomenon of engagement by proxy, where individuals
a�empt to engage directly with both the organization and those believed to
be able to influence it.
As argued earlier, the cherished (if flawed) belief that messages can
be ‘controlled’ is largely a thing of the past. There is inherent agency in
and of the internet, where messages are changed by human and machine
interventions as they hop from platform to platform, channel to channel.
An organization now competes with a wide range of other actors in the
development and dissemination of information, inexorably contributing to
what now becomes the development of value systems, across a network of
authors, platforms and channels. We deal with this in detail in Chapter 17.
Because internet users are now also contributors, they cast searing ‘net-
shine’ deep into organizations that are increasingly transparent – whether
they like it or not. These new critics have the tools – and the inclination
– to explore what organizations represent, do and say. With their enhanced
access to online content from sources like governments, ombudsmen and
regulators, and trade associations, and the comments of the wider online
and offline community, ordinary people can question the values and value
systems of organizations. And they pose – and answer – these questions in
public, on blogs and social networking sites, through wikis, podcasts and
YouTube videos.
Organizations have to be able to defend their values in public like never
before. Spin, bling, hype and exaggeration as well as ethics and practices
will be questioned and challenged, and any dissonance between the values
of users and the organization is made very publicly evident (see Chapter 26).
In developing communications strategies at a corporate level, it is evident
that there is an online view available from online interactions that also affect
brand and other reputations. The manifestation and changed behaviours
are not always evident from simple cause and effect analysis. They are the
accumulation of small ‘straws in the wind’ blown through cyberspace.
NOT WAVING, DROWNING. . .
This sea, this universe of information, has a downside. There is just too
much of it. The sheer volume of ‘facts’ and messages means all players must