Arguments for standardization
The strength of standardization in the production
and distribution of products and services is its sim-
plicity and cost. It is an easy process for executives
to understand and implement, and it is also cost-
effective. If cost is the only factor being considered,
then standardization is clearly a logical choice
because economies of scale can operate to reduce
production costs. Yet minimizing production costs
does not necessarily mean that profit increases will
follow. Simplicity is not always beneficial, and costs
are often confused with profits. Cost reductions do
not automatically lead to profit improvements, and
in fact the reverse may apply. By trying to control
production costs through standardization, the
product involved may become unsuitable for alter-
native markets. The result may be that demand
abroad will decline, which leads to profit reduction.
In some situations, cost control can be achieved but
at the expense of overall profit. It is therefore
prudent to remember that cost should not be
overemphasized. The main marketing goal is to
maximize profit, and production-cost reductions
should be considered as a secondary objective. The
two objectives are not always convergent.
When appropriate, standardization is a good
approach. For example, when a consistent company or
product image is needed, product uniformity is
required. The worldwide success of McDonald’s is
based on consistent product quality and services.
Hamburger meat, buns, and fruit pies must meet
strict specifications. This obsession with product
quality necessitates the costly export of french
fries from Canada to European franchises because
the required kind of potato is not grown in
Europe. In 1982, a Paris licensee was barred
through a court order from using McDonald’s
trademarks and other trade processes because
the licensee’s twelve Paris eateries did not meet the
required specifications.
Some products by their very nature are not or
cannot be easily modified. Musical recordings and
works of art are examples of products that are
difficult to differentiate, as are books and motion
pictures.When this is the case, the product must rise
and fall according to its own merit. Whether such
products will be successful in diverse markets is not
easy to predict. Films that do well in the USA may
do poorly in Japan. On the other hand, movies that
were not box-office hits in the USA have turned out
to be money makers in France (e.g., most of Jerry
Lewis’ films). Yet in the case of Ricky Martin, his
worldwide fame has to do in part with his France
‘98 World Cup theme song (“The Cup of Life”) – in
Spanish, English, and French.
With regard to high-technology products, both
users and manufacturers may find it desirable to
reduce confusion and promote compatibility by
introducing industry specifications that make stan-
dardization possible. A condition that may support
the production and distribution of standardized
products exists when certain products can be
associated with particular cultural universals; that is,
when consumers from different countries share
similar need characteristics and therefore want
essentially identical products. Watches are used to
keep time around the world and thus can be stan-
dardized. The diamond is another example. Levi
Strauss’ attempt to penetrate the European market
with lighter-weight jeans failed because European
consumers preferred the standard heavy-duty
American type.
Another study also found that industrial man-
agers and managers of consumer goods regarded
certain marketing-related factors differently, thus
implying that product standardization or customiza-
tion depends in part on the type of product.
Furthermore, respondents consistently regarded
competitive environment as the most important
variable affecting the extent of marketing standard-
ization.
8
While market conditions tend to support local-
ization,Western companies tend to favor standard-
ization, but there is some logic behind the practice.
Most Central and Eastern European countries are
too small to pay off for customization. In addition,
within a decade, these markets may converge to
Western Europe market structures and rules.
9
286
PRODUCT PLANNING