CHAPTER 3
51
territorial sea baseline. Within the EEZ the coastal state has
sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring, exploiting,
conserving and managing the natural resources, whether
living or non-living, of the waters superadjacent to the
seabed, the seabed and the subsoil thereof, and with regard
to other activities for the economic exploitation of the
zone, such as the production of energy from the water,
currents and winds. The coastal state has jurisdiction over
the establishment of artificial islands, installations and
structures within the zone, and control of marine scientific
research and the protection and preservation of the marine
environment. Coastal states claiming an EEZ are noted in
the Annual Notice to Mariners No 12.
Continental Shelf
3.15
1 UNCLOS defines the continental shelf as comprising the
seabed and subsoil of the submarine areas that extend
beyond its territorial sea throughout the natural
prolongation of its land territory to the outer edge of the
continental margin, or to a distance of 200 nautical miles
from the territorial sea baseline where the outer edge of the
continental margin does not extend to that distance. It
further describes the outer edge of the continental margin
as the submerged prolongation of the land mass of the
coastal state comprising the seabed and subsoil of the shelf,
the slope and the rise but excluding the deep ocean floor
with its oceanic ridges and the subsoil thereof. In the area
between the outer limit of the EEZ and the outer limit of
the continental shelf, coastal states have sovereign rights
for the purpose of exploring, exploiting, conserving and
managing the natural resources comprising mineral and
other non-living resources of the seabed or subsoil together
with living organisms belonging to sedentary species.
Sedentary species are further defined as organisms which,
at their harvestable stage, are either immobile on or under
the seabed or are unable to move except in constant
physical contact with the seabed or subsoil.
2 The rights of the coastal state in the continental shelf
area do not affect the legal status of the superadjacent
waters or air space above those waters in which the
freedom of the high seas exists. In exercising the sovereign
rights that are allowed in the continental shelf area, the
coastal state may not infringe or unjustifiably interfere with
the freedom of the high seas.
International Boundaries and Safety Zones
3.16
1 The international boundaries shown on Admiralty Charts
are approximate only and may not represent changes in
sovereignty, whether recognised or de-facto, which occur
after the publication of the chart.
2 In the territorial sea, the EEZ and the Continental Shelf,
any installation erected for the exploration or exploitation
of resources by the coastal state may have safety zones
established, generally to a distance of 500 m. Moored
installations operating in deep water may require a safety
zone in excess of 500 m in order to keep other vessels
clear of moorings and obstructions.
SHIPS’ ROUTEING
Objective
3.17
1 The purpose of Ships’ Routeing is to improve the safety
of navigation in converging areas and in areas where the
density of traffic is great or where the freedom of
movement of shipping is inhibited by restricted sea room,
the existence of obstructions to navigation, limited depths
or unfavourable meteorological conditions. Ships’ Routeing
may also be used to prevent or reduce the risk of pollution
or other damage to the marine environment caused by ships
colliding or grounding in or near environmentally sensitive
areas.
Routeing systems
3.18
1 Following the implementation of the first routeing
system in the Dover Strait in 1967, many similar systems
have been established throughout the world.
2 IMO is recognised as the sole body responsible for
establishing and recommending measures on an
international level concerning ships’ routeing. These
measures, together with details of all routeing systems
adopted by IMO (which include deep-water routes, traffic
separation schemes, precautionary areas, inshore traffic
zones and areas to be avoided by certain ships) are given
in Ships’ Routeing, published by and obtainable from IMO.
3 National governments are responsible for decisions
concerning ships’ routeing where schemes lie wholly within
their territorial waters, but such schemes may also be
submitted to IMO for approval.
Archipelagic Sea Lanes
3.19
1 Archipelagic Sea Lanes (ASLs) and air routes are routes
through and above the territorial sea and archipelagic
waters of an Archipelagic State (see 3.12) from one part of
the high seas or an exclusive economic zone to another
part of the high seas or an exclusive economic zone. They
are defined by a series of continuous axis lines from the
entry points of passage routes to the exit points.
2 The axis lines are delimited by a series of geographic
co-ordinates of latitude and longitude, referred to a geodetic
datum. Ships and aircraft exercising archipelagic sea lanes
passage shall not deviate more than 25 miles to either side
of the axis lines, provided that such ships and aircraft shall
not navigate closer to the coast than 10% of the distance
between the axis line and the nearest points on islands
bordering the sea lanes.
3 Purpose. An Archipelagic State may designate sea lanes
and air routes thereabove, suitable for the continuous and
expeditious and unobstructed transit of foreign ships and
aircraft through or over its archipelagic waters and adjacent
territorial seas between one part of the high seas or an
exclusive economic zone to another part of the high seas or
an exclusive economic zone. All ships and aircraft enjoy
the right of archipelagic sea lanes passage in such sea lanes
and air routes in their normal mode.
4 ASLs adopted by the IMO. When an Archipelagic
State submits proposed ASLs to the IMO, the recognized
competent international organisation, the IMO will ensure
that the proposed sea lanes are in conformity with the
relevant provisions in UNCLOS. The IMO will also
determine whether the submission is a full or partial sea
lanes proposal.
5 It should be noted that within ASLs traffic is not
separated except in traffic separation schemes. It should
also be noted that the axis of an ASL does not indicate the
deepest water, or any route or recommended track. The
first partial system of archipelagic sea lanes in Indonesian
archipelagic waters was adopted in 1998 and came into
force in December 2002.
6 ASLs not adopted by the IMO. If an Archipelagic
State only proposes a partial system of ASLs, or where it
decides not to designate ASLs, archipelagic sea lanes