
12.9 Compressible Flow Turbomachines
12.9 Compressible Flow Turbomachines 685
Fluids in the News
Cavitation damage in hydraulic turbines The occurrence of
cavitation in hydraulic pumps seem to be an obvious possibility
since low suction pressures are expected. Cavitation damage can
also occur in hydraulic turbines even though they do not seem
obviously prone to this kind of problem. Local acceleration of
liquid over blade surfaces can be sufficient to result in local pres-
sures low enough to cause fluid vaporization or cavitation.
Further along the flow path, the fluid can decelerate rapidly
enough with accompanying increase in local pressure to make
cavitation bubbles collapse with enough intensity to cause blade
surface damage in the form of material erosion. Over time, this
erosion can be severe enough to require blade repair or replace-
ment which is very expensive. (See Problem 12.80.)
GIVEN A hydraulic turbine is to operate at an angular veloc-
ity of 6 rev兾s, a flowrate of and a head of 20 ft.10 ft
3
Ⲑ
s,
Use of Specific Speed to Select Turbine Type
E
XAMPLE 12.9
S
OLUTION
As shown by Eq. 12.52, for maximum efficiency of a Pelton
wheel the jet velocity is ideally two times the blade velocity.
Thus, or the wheel diameter, is
To obtain a flowrate of at a velocity of
the jet diameter, must be given by
or
A Pelton wheel with a diameter of supplied with
water through a nozzle of diameter is not a prac-
tical design. Typically 1see Fig. 12.222. By using
multiple jets it would be possible to reduce the jet diameter.
However, even with 8 jets, the jet diameter would be 0.211 ft,
which is still too large 1relative to the wheel diameter2to be
practical. Hence, the above calculations reinforce the results
presented in Fig. 12.32—a Pelton wheel would not be practical
for this application. If the flowrate were considerably smaller,
the specific speed could be reduced to the range where a Pelton
wheel would be the type to use 1rather than a mixed-flow reac-
tion turbine2.
d
1
66 D
d
1
⫽ 0.596 ft
D ⫽ 0.952 ft
d
1
⫽ c
4Q
pV
1
d
1
Ⲑ
2
⫽ c
4110 ft
3
Ⲑ
s2
p135.9 ft
Ⲑ
s2
d
1
Ⲑ
2
⫽ 0.596 ft
Q ⫽
p
4
d
2
1
V
1
d
1
,V
1
⫽ 35.9 ft
Ⲑ
s,
Q ⫽ 10 ft
3
Ⲑ
s
D ⫽
V
1
v
⫽
35.9 ft
Ⲑ
s
16 rev
Ⲑ
s ⫻ 2p rad
Ⲑ
rev2
⫽ 0.952 ft
D ⫽ 2R,V
1
⫽ 2vR,
The most efficient type of turbine to use can be obtained by cal-
culating the specific speed, , and using the information of Fig.
12.32. To use the dimensional form of the specific speed indicated
in Fig. 12.32 we must convert the given data into the appropriate
units. For the rotor speed we get
To estimate the shaft power, we assume all of the available head
is converted into power and multiply this amount by an assumed
efficiency 194%2.
Thus for this turbine,
According to the information of Fig. 12.32,
A mixed-flow Francis turbine would
probably give the highest efficiency and
an assumed efficiency of 0.94 is appropriate.
(Ans)
COMMENT What would happen if we wished to use a Pelton
wheel for this application? Note that with only a 20-ft head, the
maximum jet velocity, obtainable 1neglecting viscous effects2
would be
V
1
⫽ 12 gz ⫽ 22 ⫻ 32.2 ft
Ⲑ
s
2
⫻ 20 ft ⫽ 35.9 ft
Ⲑ
s
V
1
,
N¿
sd
⫽
v2W
#
shaft
1h
a
2
5
Ⲑ
4
⫽
1360 rpm2 221.3 hp
120 ft2
5
Ⲑ
4
⫽ 39.3
W
#
shaft
⫽ 21.3 hp
W
#
shaft
⫽ gQzh ⫽ 162.4 lb
Ⲑ
ft
3
2110 ft
3
Ⲑ
s2c
20 ft10.942
550 ft
#
lb
Ⲑ
s
#
hp
d
v ⫽ 6 rev
Ⲑ
s ⫻ 60 s
Ⲑ
min ⫽ 360 rpm
N¿
sd
FIND What type of turbine should be selected? Explain.
Compressible flow turbomachines are in many ways similar to the incompressible flow pumps and
turbines described in previous portions of this chapter. The main difference is that the density of
the fluid 1a gas or vapor2changes significantly from the inlet to the outlet of the compressible flow
machines. This added feature has interesting consequences, benefits, and complications.
JWCL068_ch12_645-700.qxd 9/25/08 8:48 PM Page 685