9.6 Air-Standard Brayton Cycle 391
If the temperatures at the numbered states of the cycle are known, the specific enthalpies
required by the foregoing equations are readily obtained from the ideal gas table for air,
Table A-22. Alternatively, with the sacrifice of some accuracy, the variation of the specific
heats with temperature can be ignored and the specific heats taken as constant. The air-
standard analysis is then referred to as a cold air-standard analysis. As illustrated by the
discussion of internal combustion engines given previously, the chief advantage of the
assumption of constant specific heats is that simple expressions for quantities such as thermal
efficiency can be derived, and these can be used to deduce qualitative indications of cycle
performance without involving tabular data.
Since Eqs. 9.15 through 9.20 have been developed from mass and energy rate balances,
they apply equally when irreversibilities are present and in the absence of irreversibilities.
Although irreversibilities and losses associated with the various power plant components have
a pronounced effect on overall performance, it is instructive to consider an idealized cycle
in which they are assumed absent. Such a cycle establishes an upper limit on the perform-
ance of the air-standard Brayton cycle. This is considered next.
9.6.2 Ideal Air-Standard Brayton Cycle
Ignoring irreversibilities as the air circulates through the various components of the Brayton
cycle, there are no frictional pressure drops, and the air flows at constant pressure through
the heat exchangers. If stray heat transfers to the surroundings are also ignored, the processes
through the turbine and compressor are isentropic. The ideal cycle shown on the p–v and T–s
diagrams in Fig. 9.10 adheres to these idealizations.
Areas on the T–s and p–v diagrams of Fig. 9.10 can be interpreted as heat and work, re-
spectively, per unit of mass flowing. On the T–s diagram, area 2–3–a–b–2 represents the heat
added per unit of mass and area 1–4–a–b–1 is the heat rejected per unit of mass. On the p–v
diagram, area 1–2–a–b–1 represents the compressor work input per unit of mass and area
3–4–b–a–3 is the turbine work output per unit of mass (Sec. 6.9). The enclosed area on each
figure can be interpreted as the net work output or, equivalently, the net heat added.
When air table data are used to conduct an analysis involving the ideal Brayton cycle,
the following relationships, based on Eq. 6.43, apply for the isentropic processes 1–2
and 3–4
(9.21)
(9.22)
p
r4
p
r3
p
4
p
3
p
r3
p
1
p
2
p
r2
p
r1
p
2
p
1
T
s
2
1
2′
3′
3
4
b
a
p
v
41
23
p = c
p = c
s = c
s = c
a
b
Figure 9.10 Air-standard ideal Brayton cycle.