Reactions (14) and (15) are the rate-determining steps (i.e., a higher activation
energy is required for these reactions compared with the discharge of hydrogen
ions) for many metals and alloys, including iron in deaerated aqueous solutions.
The rate-determinating steps may, however, be different in the case of complex
corrosion layers. Sulfate-reducing bacteria, by removing adsorbed hydrogen to
form sulfide according to reaction (9), lower the activation energy for the desorption
steps. As these steps are rate determinating, this may lead to higher corrosion rates
if hydrogen evolution is thermodynamically possible (i.e., if the immunity potential
is lower than the redox potential for H
2
/H
+
).
This theory, also referred to in the literature as the classical depolarization
theory, suggests that only sulfate-reducing bacteria that are hydrogenase positive
(i.e., bacteria in which the enzyme hydrogenase is present) are responsible for the
anaerobic corrosion of iron. Even though there are data supporting this view
[9,57], it has been shown in many other works that this is not the case and that a
high corrosion rate may be obtained with hydrogenase-negative strains [10,81,92].
In addition, several other important factors are not taken into account in the classical
depolarization theory: (a) the effects of sulfide, bisulfide, and hydrogen sulfide
produced from the sulfate reduction on the anodic reaction; (b) the effect of
hydrogen sulfide on the cathodic reaction; (c) the effect of elemental sulfur from
the biotic or abiotic oxidation of sulfur; (d) fluctuations in the environmental
conditions between anaerobic and aerobic conditions [47]; (e) the production of
other corrosive metabolites [128].
It is therefore now widely accepted that, even if the so-called depolarization
of the cathodic reaction by the enzyme hydrogenase occurs, it plays no more than
a secondary role in the pitting corrosion of iron in anaerobic conditions. This theory
is therefore reported here more for historical interest than as a potential mechanism
for pitting corrosion of iron in presence of SRB.
More recent theories have been proposed in which the role of the biogenic
sulfide, the formation of a galvanic cell between the metal and the iron sulfide film
formed, the role of elemental sulfur, the role of iron phosphites, and the local
acidification of anodes have been discussed. The alternative theories to the classical
depolarization theory are presented briefly in Table 2.
It has also been shown that the nature of the iron sulfide film plays an important
role in the initiation of pitting corrosion. Figure 5 shows the different biogenically
and chemically formed iron sulfide films [93]. When protective films such as
mackinawite and siderite are formed, the corrosion rate may be very low. However,
with changes in the environmental conditions these films may be transformed to iron
sulfides that are less protective, such as pyrrhotite, with the possible initiation of pits
as a result. The importance of the environment for the initiation of localized corrosion
by SRB as been mentioned by several authors [24,51]. Of particular importance is
the ability of SRB to regulate pH, the ionic composition, the composition of Fe
2+
,
aerobic/anaerobic cycles, and the presence of other microorganisms, as they may
lead to conditions resulting in passivation or uniform corrosion or localized
corrosion. This is probably the main reason why the severe pitting corrosion
experienced in the field is only seldom reproduced in the laboratory using growing
cultures of SRB, where uniform corrosion is generally observed. Indeed, in practice
SRB are not found in isolation but in consortia of microorganisms or biofilms
in which many physicochemical parameters such as pH and dissolved oxygen
580 Thierry and Sand
Copyright © 2002 Marcel Dekker, Inc.