page_316
file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/Rar$EX01.335/The%20War%20for%20America%20%201775-1783/files/page_316.html[1/17/2011 2:27:11 PM]
< previous page page_316 next page >
Page 316
The channel used in the end was opened by Germain a day or two before Hillsborough dropped his hint to the
Neapolitan Minister. The agent was an Irish priest named Hussey, who had been chaplain to the Spanish embassy
in London. Which party took the initiative is uncertain. Hussey told Floridablanca that the subject was opened by
Germain when he visited the American Department on behalf of some interned priests; but the British reports of his
conversation suggest that it was Hussey who had dropped the first hints. This is not impossible, for he was an
energetic and politically-minded priest on his way to a mitre, and his statement to the contrary may have been no
more than an attempt to conceal his presumption from his Spanish masters. Yet this is not the end of the question.
For Hussey was a known intelligence agent of the Spanish government, and since the departure of the ambassador
he had been fed with military intelligence by a counter-spy in communication with Germain. There is a possibility
that even if Hussey was induced to make the first move, the British had intended him to do so.1
In December Hussey travelled to Madrid, equipped with an unofficial letter from Germain assuring him that a
formal overture would be welcomed. Richard Cumberland, the Secretary of the Board of Trade and a personal
friend of Germain, had handled the preliminary talks with Hussey in November, and had received a strong
impression from him that Spain dreaded attacks on her colonies in the coming year; and Hussey was accordingly
furnished with a strong hint that the Spanish colonies were indeed to be assailed.2 On 17 December, soon after his
departure, a despatch from Jamaica announced the first success against the Spanish Main, the capture of Omoa;
and three days
1 Bemis, op. cit., 19, n. 11; Sackville, I, 3236. The origins of the negotiation remain obscure. Cumberland's
account to Shelburne in May 1782 (in the British Museum: kindly communicated to me by Father J. S.
Benedict Cullen) is as follows. Floridablanca had had no confidence in the Spanish Ambassador,
Almadovar, and had maintained confidential communications with Hussey. When war broke out Hussey
returned to England (as Superintending Priest for the Spanish prisoners according to the Spanish archives,
though he told Cumberland his sole object was to purchase astronomical instruments). He remained in
communication with Madrid as their intelligence agent, of which Cumberland was kept informed by
William Wardlaw, a British agent. Wardlaw reported that Hussey talked much of his desire to see peace re-
established, and Germain agreed that he should be sounded about this. Hussey accepted the invitation and
opened himself on the subject, making the condition that their conversations should be kept secret from the
rest of the Cabinet.
Thus the first move would appear to have come from the British side. But there is a doubtful circumstance:
Wardlaw was a double spy, employed and paid by the Spaniards and known to them as acquainted with
Germain. So it remains possible that Hussey paved the way for the conversations: Cumberland (Sackville, I,
328) believed that he was acting for the Spanish Court.
2 Sackville, I, 327, 331; memoranda by Hussey in the Spanish archives, communicated by Fr. Cullen.
< previous page page_316 next page >