288 R. Lizarralde et al.
sized stone particles in specific percentages. Variations in this distribution lead to
different material denominations, such as the Granitan
®
, registered by the company
Studer
®
. The advantages of polymer concrete in comparison with cast iron are:
• Technically, a much better damping ratio, a better thermal response and similar
or better stiffness achievable in the parts. Table 8.1 presents the comparative
values between polymer concrete, cast iron and steel.
• From the manufacturing side, a proper design of the structural parts allows to
include into the structural elements components such as guideways, or fluid and
electric conductions, obtaining better assembly and set-up times.
Natural granite is less extended than polymer concrete, but in the last years it
has grown in applications, especially in very high precision machines. The main
virtue supporting its use is the stability along time, besides the mechanical charac-
teristics achievable. An example of a cylindrical high precision machine bed made
by granite is presented in Fig. 8.8 and in Chap. 6, Fig. 6.15a.
8.2.3 Main Components
This section will focus on the components that have a significant influence on the
machine behaviour, in particular driving systems and guideways.
8.2.3.1 Driving Systems
Since the strong development of electronics, electric motors and controls, the most
expanded driving system in machine tools and, consequently in grinding, has been
that composed by a ball screw driven, by means of a belt transmission directly
operated by an electric motor. This is the most standard configuration, applied in
horizontal and vertical axes, to drive the workpiece and wheelhead.
Nevertheless, this basic configuration has experienced several significant de-
velopments, oriented to improve the performance of the system in concordance
with the market increasing demands. Beyond the general improvements achieved,
in terms of higher speeds available, obtained through new lower-friction materials,
surface coatings applied and new ball screw designs, the most remarkable con-
cerning grinding process requirements, are:
• Hydrostatic ball screws. One of the disadvantages of ball screws concerning
their use in grinding is the metallic contact between the two moving parts con-
nected by the ball screw. On the one side, this is because any geometric or sur-
face error in the system can be directly translated to the contact between part
and grinding wheel, and finally “copied” into the ground surface. On the other
side, this is due to the absolute lack of damping introduced by that metallic
contact. Hydrostatic technology has been developed for ball screws using the
experience and principles applied over the years in hydrostatic guides. The