Environmental Catalysts 463
11.2.5 Nitrogen Oxide Removal in Lean-Burn Engines
Lean-burn engines are more fuel-efficient when there is an excess of oxygen in
the combustion gas and emit less carbon dioxide per mile travelled. Lean condi-
tions lead to lower levels of NO
x
in the exhaust gas, but the introduction of fu-
ture legislation on the NO
x
content of the exhaust will require that further reduc-
tion will have to be considered. NO
x
removal in the presence of excess oxygen is
more difficult than removal under stoichiometric conditions because normally
the NO
x
is reduced by some of the unburnt carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons
in the exhaust.
A partial solution to the NO
X
removal problem with lean-burn engines may
be the use of a platinum/rhodium catalyst combined with a barium oxide trap
that can absorb nitrogen dioxide as nitrate. The mechanism of the reaction is:
• nitric oxide is oxidized to nitrogen dioxide on a platinum site;
• the nitrogen dioxide forms barium nitrate on the trap before it can leave
the catalytic converter;
• alternating rich operation for a few seconds every minute or so, releases
the nitrogen dioxide which can then be reduced by carbon monoxide or
hydrocarbon at a rhodium site.
The cycle then repeats during subsequent lean/rich operation.
The main problem with the barium oxide approach is that sulfur dioxide
competes with NO
x
for the basic sites, and is converted irreversibly to barium
sulphate, which is quite inert. Thus, the active barium sites are quickly saturated,
and the removal of NO
x
from the emission is severely restricted. The sulfur con-
tent of the gasoline would need to be much lower for this approach to provide a
long-term solution to the NO
x
problem. There may also be problems associated
with the thermal stability of the barium oxide traps during the many redox cy-
cles, which the catalyst would be expected to experience over the lifetime of an
autocatalyst.
Other procedures have been suggested for the treatment of the exhaust
from lean-burn engines. One possibility is the absorption of NO
x
on a suitable
zeolite, followed by desorption and recycle of the NO
x
back to the engine, where
it would be reduced by some of the fuel in the combustion chambers. The prob-
lem with this approach is that most zeolites suffer from dealumination in the
presence of steam at high temperature. An alternative approach could be the
direct reduction of NO
x
with hydrocarbons using a copper/ZSM-5 zeolite cata-
lyst, but this has not yet been feasible, because the catalyst is deactivated at tem-
peratures above 450ºC. Tin oxide, supported on alumina, is also active for the
reduction of NO
x
by olefins in lean-burn exhaust gases. The olefin intermediate
formed on the tin oxide surface can react with nitrogen oxide on an adjacent
alumina site. Although such catalysts have not yet been used in autocatalysts, it
is a further example of how autocatalysts, which already contain several compo-
nents, must now be designed for specific duties.
37