
VIOLENCE
333
lar
agitation to force Turkey
to
recognize
Macedonian
autonomy in line
with
the guarantees of Article XXIII
of
the
Treaty of Berlin. It was open to all
Macedonians,
whether Serbian, Greek, Rumanian, Turkish,
Jewish,
or
Bulgarian. In 1903 the IMRO fostered
an
uprising which,
though crushed by the Turks, precipitated European inter-
vention. It was not until 1906 that
a
constitution
was rati-
fied by a general assembly of the
IMRO. "Macedonia for
Macedonians" and "Evolution not Revolution"
were the
principal slogans. Local committees were elected
by uni-
versal suffrage; each committee sent delegates
to a rayon
committee; above this was the okrug committee, corre-
sponding to the vilayet. The okrug committee sent 47
dele-
gates to the regular general congress, which elected the
central committee
of
three. Another body appointed
by
the
central committee represented the organization in the
pur-
chase of arms and ammunition from outsiders.
No
single
person was ever given authority. Owing to the breakdown
of
Turkish
administration, the IMRO took over the
courts,
suppressed brigandage, and maintained schools. Military
groups executed the
decrees
of
courts,
and
a
secret village
militia stood ready for emergencies.
The case of the IMRO is
exceptional.
The organization
of economics and diplomacy is usually far less complete,
especially in
revolutionary movements.
It is seldom
pos-
sible in
advance
of violence to regiment those
who are
friendly to
the objective sought. As
a
rule, therefore,
suc-
cessful
violence is relatively more dependent upon proper
coordination with propaganda. Successful violence in revo-
lution
depends upon
the conjunction
of a
coup d'etat
with
a
crisis
of
mass
discontent. The
coup
d'etat can
be executed
by
a
small number of storm
troops which
are well in-
formed, armed, and trained;
but the chances
of
securing
a loyal
conspirative
personnel, and of
carrying
througl^