PUBLISHER'S FOREWORD
sonalities."
The
latter are driven
by inner motivations
to
prefer politics
above all other careers. Professor
Lasswell
develops some
fundamental hypotheses
about the "political
man"
as a
social type,
and about some of the sub-types,
such as the
"agitator," "theorist" and
"administrator." The
intensive study
of political
leaders disclosed the working
of
"non-rational" influences in
politics, and indicated that
special
precautions were
necessary if political judgments
are
to
be made on a
relatively
rational basis.
The
Psycho-
pathology
emphasizes
the "politics
of
prevention"
as a
means of
liberating
the constructive potentialities
of man.
It has often been pointed
out
that
the
examination
of
politics from the standpoint of modern
psychology has
revitalized the scientific
study of political behavior by
freeing political science from excessive "legalism."
It
was
the purpose of Politics: Who
Gets
What, When, Hoiv
to
clarify the nature
of
politics
"in a new key." Instead of
defining political science
as the "science of the
state,"
Lasswell conceived of politics as the shaping and sharing
of
values. Among
these values were named such "repre-
sentative" ones as "safety, income and deference." In a
limited sense, of course, political scientists might con-
centrate on "power," defined
as the
making
of
important
decisions. The essential point in any
case
is to view po-
litical behavior
as
part
of
the entire stream
of
behavior of
man in society.
Professor Lasswell
once
characterized Politics:
Who
Gets What, When, How
as an expansion of
the first para-
graph
of
the systematic
volume originally
published in
1935 and
called
World
Politics
and Personal
Insecurity
(republished
in
1950
in A Study
of
Power, together
with
related studies
by
Professors
Charles
E. Merriam and T.
V. Smith). The aim
of
the expansion was to provide con-
crete examples
of
how
to
conceive
of the
political process.