CONCLUSION ■ 179
Tajikistan was the region’s basket case. Although its civil war officially
had ended in 1997, in reality Tajikistan was coming apart at the seams.
The government’s authority did not extend beyond Dushanbe, the capi-
tal, and the country’s borders were being policed by soldiers operating
under Russian control. According to a World Bank report issued in 2002,
83 percent of the country’s people were living in poverty. Tajikistan was
what political scientists call a failed state: a country where the central
government in effect does not function and social and economic institu-
tions consequently are in a state of collapse.
Kyrgyzstan, while better off than Tajikistan, was also on the verge of
becoming a failed state. This was both ironic and especially sad because
in 1991 President Akayev, the only Central Asian president who was not
a Communist Party functionary during the Soviet era, had been commit-
ted to free-market economic reform. At that point he even seemed to
favor democratic political reforms. But over the next decade the impact
of economic decline far outweighed any positive results from economic
reform. While he certainly was not a Niyazov or Karimov, with each pass-
ing year Akayev began to look less like a Western democratic leader and
more like an old Soviet party boss and traditional Central Asian despot.
By 2003, Kyrgyzstan was deeply in debt, dependent on foreign aid, and
increasingly under the influence of Kazakhstan, its huge neighbor to the
north.
Turkmenistan was something of a bad international joke. It had great
potential riches because of its natural gas reserves, but it also was under
the thumb of an egomaniacal dictator whose policies were ruinous. Any
real progress clearly would have to await President Niyazov’s departure
from office, whether by natural causes, given his questionable health, or
by virtue of a political coup.
Uzbekistan was a milder but decidedly more powerful version of Turk-
menistan. With the largest population in Central Asia, and with signifi-
cant Uzbek minorities in several neighboring states, Uzbekistan was a
rival both to Russia and Kazakhstan for influence in the region. Its natu-
ral resources, if properly developed, potentially provided the basis for
future prosperity. However, Uzbekistan also languished under a corrupt
dictatorship that was committed mainly to maintaining itself in power,
closing the country to foreign influences, and delaying meaningful eco-
nomic reform. That did not add up to a promising future.
NIT-CentAsianReps -blues 11/18/08 9:58 AM Page 179