268 6 Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Catalytic Oxide Materials
phorus oxide s ( VPO ). Different types of technology were developed (fi xed, fl uid-
ized or transported bed reactors), and an important aspect of the following
discussion is that the catalyst is able to operate in both oxidizing and reducing
environments.
Several review papers have been published on VPO materials, covering
various aspects, from preparation and characterization to the catalytic properties,
with focus on the reaction mechanism [125 – 129] . In brief, VPO as a complex
catalytic system can comprise many distinct and known phases ( α - , β - , γ - , δ -
VOPO
4
, (VO)
2
P
2
O
7
, VO(PO
3
)
2
, VPO
4
, etc.) but also less well characterized amor-
phous material. It is prepared by different (e.g. aqueous, alcoholic) routes with
the intermediate formation of VO(HPO
4
) · 0.5H
2
O, the hemihydrate, which is
the precursor of the active catalyst. Depending on the P : V ratio in the precipi-
tation and the conditions of the heat treatment of the precursor material, the
prepared “ non - equilibrated ” catalyst can comprise different phases with various
degrees of crystallinity and defect structure. However, after long - term operation
the catalysts prepared in the conventional VPD route exhibited high crystallinity
and the only phase identifi ed by XRD was (VO)
2
P
2
O
7
(VPP) [128, 130 – 134] .
This led several research groups to conclude that (VO)
2
P
2
O
7
(i.e. V
4+
) is the
active material and that its (100) crystal plane (which is supposed to be the
most exposed) contains the active sites. Different preparation routes, however,
resulted in materials with non - uniform bulk structure and different Brunauer –
Emmett – Teller surface area, but comparable intrinsic activity [129, 135] . This
led Hutchings to conclude that the surfaces exposed on these different materials
must all be the same, even though their bulk structures are completely differ-
ent. Furthermore, the necessity of crystallinity becomes dubious considering
that the amorphous vanadium phosphate catalyst prepared by the same group
(Hutchings and coworkers) [136] in supercritical CO
2
conditions was more
active (MA formation rate per surface unit) than the comparable crystalline
VPO catalysts, although with worse selectivity. Previously, combined XRD,
31
P
NMR and Raman studies [137 – 139] indicated that XRD alone is not suffi cient
for identifying the presence of minority phases, and that not only V
4+
but some
V
5+
species exist in almost all materials. Many studies [137, 140 – 144] provided
indirect evidence that vanadium in both oxidation states is needed for the whole
catalytic process. Furthermore, Coulston and coworkers [145] argued about the
central role of V
5+
, as its reduction showed a good quantitative correlation with
the MA formation on supported VPO. Thus there is no clear agreement in the
literature about the active sites of the reaction. Even the reaction mechanism,
the participation of lattice or various types of surface oxygen species (
O
2
−
,
O
2
2−
,
O
−
) and the role of phosphorus enrichment remain under discussion [126, 128,
146 – 150] .
Being relatively surface sensitive, XPS can contribute to an understanding of
this catalytic system, and has already done so. It gives valuable information on the
formal oxidation state and the stoichiometry of the constituents in the sampling
depth of the technique. However, XPS investigations reported in the literature are