256 6 Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Catalytic Oxide Materials
calculations [64, 67] confi rmed the strong hybridization of the valence oxygen and
vanadium orbitals in V
2
O
5
, and related the distortion of the VO
6
octahedra to the
unique electronic structure of the conduction band. A recent DFT cluster study
[50] mimicking V
2
O
5
has clearly indicated that the local charges (Mulliken) of the
different cluster atoms are much smaller than formal valence charges (V
+1.4
; O
− 0.26
,
O
− 0.58
, O
− 0.78
for the three different lattice O positions), in line with the suggested
covalent bonding contribution. DFT calculations on other oxides reported similar
discrepancies between partial and formal charges [68 – 71] . It is well known among
quantum chemists, and we would also stress, that although Mulliken charges and
formal valence charges may yield the same qualitative picture, they cannot be
compared on a quantitative basis. Formal valence charges may be useful in certain
cases, but if considered as a universal tool, they can easily lead to erroneous con-
clusions and reaction models, as often observed in the heterogeneous catalysis
community. In what follows, we will use integer valence charges (e.g. V
5+
) to rep-
resent formal oxidation states, while fractional numbers (e.g. V
+1.4
) will indicate
local charges calculated by DFT methods.
The electronic structure of vanadium oxides is crucial to their reactivity. Deter-
mination of even the formal oxidation state of vanadium from XPS can, however,
be non - trivial, owing to a variety of factors. Firstly, examination of binary vanadium
oxides has highlighted that there appear to be differences in binding - energy posi-
tions and FWHM for single crystal and powder samples (see Table 6.1 ). In general,
the binding energy quoted for V
2
O
5
is quite consistent, ranging from 516.9 to
517.2 eV. However, Table 6.1 shows that the ranges of energies given for V
4+
and
V
3+
in the literature are considerably wider, and in some cases overlap. This can
be for a number of reasons, including variations in equipment/analyzer, surface
cleaning method, background and satellite subtraction and subsequent calibration
of the binding - energy scale. A relatively reliable binding - energy calibration method,
at least in the case of reduced oxides, may be to use the band gap transition of the
V 3d peak in the valence band [63] . Additionally, the widths of V 2p core levels
increase from V
2
O
5
to open valence VO
2
and to V
2
O
3
. This behavior is due to the
increasing number of available multiplet confi gurations in the corresponding
photoelectron fi nal states, that is, non - resolved multiplet splitting occurs in V 2p
core levels of lower valence vanadium oxides. This effect is also observed in the
mixed valence vanadium oxides such as V
6
O
13
(V
2 n
O
5 n − 2
, Wadsley phase) or V
4
O
7
and V
3
O
5
(V
n
O
2 n − 1
, Magn é li phase). An XPS study of these phases [74] has shown
similarities to the studies of V
2
O
5
, VO
2
and V
2
O
3
, where strong hybridization
between the O 2p and V 3d states is observed. The broad nature of the V 2p peak
of the mixed oxide phases was attributed to the mixture of oxidation states present
as well as to surface defects.
Further diffi culties in measuring vanadium oxides arise from reliable prepara-
tion of reference compounds and reduction of vanadium caused by UHV condi-
tions and beam damage [78, 79] . Hence, it is advantageous to confi rm the phases
present by additional analytical techniques.
As expected, the diffi culties in relating binding energies to formal oxidation
states of vanadium becomes more complex in the case of supported vanadium