30 HRW / September 2009 www.hydroworld.com
Who do the World’s dam owners
call for waterway barriers?
They call Worthington
Worthington is a name you can trust for all of your
waterway barriers needs including debris and trash
barriers, heavy duty hyacinth control, boat barriers,
security barriers as well as a range of customized
solutions tailored to your project..
Our worldwide installation base includes Canada,
Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Uganda, Chile, Indonesia,
Suriname, Mozambique, Italy, Sweden, Panama,
USA and more.
You can count on Worthington to provide quality
barriers, competent engineering and outstanding
customer service.
LOG & DEBRIS BOOMS
LOG & DEBRIS BOOMS
BOAT BARRIERS
BOAT BARRIERS
Call l 001.330.452.7400 Click l www.tuffboom.com
Worthington waterway barriers
Log jam at flood control dam in Pennsylvania (USA)
http://hrw.hotims.com RS #22
dif cult. The laboratory reported that the
fracture surface appeared both ductile and
trans-crystalline and that the fracture ap-
peared to have been instantaneous. On one
surface, a crescent-shaped initiation point
was evident. The yield point and rupture
strength in the material were 3 to 5 percent
suggested a sudden water level increase
as a possible cause, along with ice load-
ing, bending of the anchor at the plate,
and material weakness in the anchor bar.
Finally, the anchor supplier mentioned
that welding often leads to ruptures in
this type of high-strength material.
Pursuing a better explanation
After reviewing the initial reports, Vatten-
fall’s dam safety engineers decided a more
detailed investigation was needed in order
to prevent similar incidents in the future.
T he team of fou r eng ineers assi gned to t he
investigation brought expertise in metal-
lurgy, concrete, design, and dam safety.
In conducting the investigation, they used
Vattenfall’s metallurgical and concrete
laboratories in Alvkarleby, as well as other
laboratories. The investigations included
chemical and metallographic analyses,
magnetic particle testing, penetrant test-
ing, ultrasonic inspection, impact testing,
and grease analysis.
Chemical and metallographic analyses
Ruptured anchors were subjected to a
chemical analysis using optical emission
spectroscopy. The analysis indicated that
the constituent elements in the steel fell
within published industry standards, with
the exception of a slightly lower-than-
standard manganese content. The micro-
structure of one of the anchors also was
studied under an optical microscope and
was consistent with the chemical analysis.
Vattenfall’s laboratory staff also per-
formed nondestructive testing on the
ruptured anchors, including ultrasonic
testing of the end of the bars and dye
penetration tests and magnetic particle
inspection of the surface of the ruptured
anchors. None of these tests revealed
cracks in the anchors. At the same time,
laboratory staff performed a separate
test of the ultrasonic method on an in-
tentionally cracked bar. The test showed
lower than the European standard values of
1,080 megapascals and 1,230 megapascals,
respectively. The laboratory report indicat-
ed that the probable cause of failure was an
overload, such as a sudden high water level.
The design consultant, who was not
aware of the laboratory’s ndings, also
||| | | |
Previous Page Contents Zoom in Zoom out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page
HRW
F
||| | | |
Previous Page Contents Zoom in Zoom out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page
HRW
F