Tunnel valleys 243
the former ice margin. These features, apparently first described by
Ussing (1903) from Jylland in Denmark, are called tunnel valleys. They
are typically 10–20 km long, although they may be shorter or longer;
afew hundred meters wide; and ∼10 m deep, though depths as great
as 70 m have been reported (Wright, 1973) and the depth of any fill
is generally not known. Small eskers are occasionally associated with
the valleys (Johnson, 1999; Mooers 1989), and some valleys have tribu-
taries or distributaries. The valleys end at former ice margins, where they
debouch onto proglacial gravel fans. Thus, they must have been formed
subglacially. The lack of evidence for modification by overriding ice
implies that any subsequent ice movement was probably not very vigor-
ous. Some tunnel valleys in Minnesota trend across the regional gradient
and are cross cut by present stream courses (Wright, 1973). Others ascend
adverse gradients near their termini (Cutler et al., 2002; Mooers, 1989).
Both characteristics suggest that they were excavated by pressurized sub-
glacial water. Mooers describes one situation in which a tunnel valley
terminating at one recessional moraine is cross cut by a younger tunnel
valley terminating at a younger recessional moraine. The process of for-
mation thus must have been intermittent, with the earlier valley becoming
completely closed, presumably by infilling with ice, before the later one
formed. Tunnel valleys are rare or absent along the most southerly margin
of the Laurentide Ice Sheet, suggesting that they may be characteristic
of colder environments where frozen bed conditions were likely to have
been present along the ice margin (Cutler et al., 2000). This, however, is
controversial.
The origin of the water and the nature of the flows that cut the tunnel
valleys are actively debated. Was the water from basal melt alone, or
was there a contribution from the surface? Was the water flow contin-
uous over a period of decades or centuries, or was the water released
catastrophically? Wright argued for a catastrophic release of subglacial
water because he thought that a number of tunnel valleys were carved
simultaneously and that the ice was cold enough to preclude drainage
from the surface. Cutler et al. found that some fans at the ends of tun-
nel valleys consisted of tens of meters of sand and gravel overlain by
a bed, 3–5 m thick, containing boulders up to 2 m in diameter. They
thought the gravel might have been deposited by superglacial melt-
water reaching the bed through moulins near the margin. The boulder
bed, however, seemed to require a water flux greater than could be sup-
plied by superglacial water or by steady-state basal melt. Accordingly,
they suggested that it was deposited by subglacial water that was released
when a seal was breached. They believed that the seal was a marginal
zone in which the ice was frozen to the bed. Relict permafrost features,