January 26, 2004 16:26 WSPC/Book Trim Size for 9in x 6in b ook2
370 Quantum Theory of the Optical and Electronic Properties of Semiconductors
than twice the exciton binding energy of 9meV in this quantum well.
REFERENCES
M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions
(Dover Publ., 1972)
J.D. Dow and D. Redfield, Phys. Rev. B1, 3358 (1970)
I.A. Merkulov and V.I. Perel, Phys. Lett. 45A, 83 (1973)
I.A. Merkulov, Sov. Phys. JETP 39, 1140 (1974)
D.A.B. Miller, D.S. Chemla, T.C. Damen, A.C. Gossard, W. Wiegmann,
T.H. Wood, and C.A. Burrus, Phys. Rev. B32, 1043 (1985)
S. Schmitt-Rink, D.S. Chemla, and D.A.B. Miller, Adv. in Phys. 38,89
(1989)
PROBLEMS
Problem 18.1: (a) Use first-order perturbation theory in the applied field
to evaluate the absorption spectrum, Eq. (18.42), for the quantum-confined
Franz-Keldysh effect. Use the basis functions (18.41) to show the reduction
in oscillator strength for the transition between the lowest electron–hole
subband, 0, h → 0, e. This transition is fully allowed without field, and it
is reduced in the presence of the field. (b) Use the same method as in (a)
to show that the field makes the transition 0, h → 1e dipole allowed.
Problem 18.2: Show that the tunnel integral, first term of Eq. (18.88),
can be transformed into the expression
T
1
= F
1/2
z
2
z
1
dz
√
z
(z
2
− z)(z − z
1
) (18.98)
and further into the form
T
1
=
3/2
2
3/2
F
s
2
+1
−1
dt
1 − t
2
1+st
=
3/2
2
3/2
F
s
2
I(s) , (18.99)
where s =
1 −
8F
2
=
1 − y
2
.
Problem 18.3: Show that the evaluation of the integral I(s), defined in
Eq. (18.99), for s =1gives the Franz-Keldysh result I(1) =
4
3
√
2.