DIFFUSION IN SOME PEROVSKITES, GUPTA 507
energy for Ni diffusion in the YBCO specimens (epitaxial thin-film, poly-
crystalline, or single-crystal specimens) is very similar to that for the Cu
tracer between 240 to 260 kJ/mol. This is understandable since both
occupy the same sites and have similar electrical charge.
Figure 10.10 shows that the
63
Ni radioactive tracer data in the
(100) epitaxial films agree reasonably well with the secondary ion
mass spectroscopy (SIMS) diffusion data of Ni in the c direction of
single crystals of YBa
2
Cu
3
O
7x
. The principal difference is in D
o
for
the
63
Ni data in polycrystalline bulk specimens due to contributions of
grain boundaries present in the specimens (see Fig. 10.1). The small
difference between the Ni diffusion coefficients in the epitaxial films
and the single crystals seen in Fig. 10.10 may be attributed to the pres-
ence of a higher density of dislocations in the former rather than
anisotropy of the diffusion coefficients, because both were diffused in
the c direction.
10.2.4.2 Cation Impurity Diffusion and Effect of
Charge Imbalance
In Fig. 10.11, impurity cation diffusion for Zn, Ni, Ag, and Co
[6–8]
is
compared with the Cu self-diffusion data.
[7, 8]
Note that charge may be an
important factor in determining the sites occupied by impurity cations;
consequently, the diffusion kinetics will be affected. It is well recognized
that Zn and Ni in low concentrations, of the order of 0.05%, substitute Cu
in Cu (1) sites,
[23]
but in higher concentrations (≈0.30) they occupy Cu (1)
and Cu (2) sites randomly.
[24]
Ag also replaces Cu on Cu (1) and Cu (2)
sites,
[25]
while Co occupies exclusively the Cu (1) sites.
[26]
For radiotracer
studies that involve very small concentrations, we may consider that Zn,
Ni, and Co all go into Cu (1) sites. Because of their close proximity to
oxygen-ion vacancies, diffusion along Cu (1) sites is much faster than
along Cu (2) sites. Furthermore, the valent states of (a) Cu, Zn, (b) Co, Ni,
and (c) Ag are 2, 2 or 3, and Ag 1, respectively. As Fig. 10.11
shows, that diffusion of Zn in bulk YBCO specimens falls on the Cu self-
diffusion Arrhenius plot. This is not surprising since both Cu and Zn have
2 states and Zn occupies Cu (1) sites. Ni diffusion in the epitaxial films
also come very close to the Cu self-diffusion line, indicating that it is
likely to diffuse in the Cu (1) sites in the Ni
2
state. Ag, on the other hand,
diffuses substantially faster than Cu or Zn. Routbort et al.
[8]
have
advanced an explanation to account for this difference: Ag
1
, being nega-
tively charged with respect to the Cu
2
ion it replaces, may attract oxygen-
ion vacancies for charge compensation, thereby lowering the activation
energy for motion at the saddle point. As a converse corollary, if Co