7 The Britannica Guide to Statistics and Probability 7
304
the Earth. The English mathematician Isaac Newton
asserted in the Principia (1687) that the Earth has an oblate
(grapefruit) shape as a result of its spin, causing the equa-
torial diameter to exceed the polar diameter by about 1
part in 230. In 1718 the director of the Paris Observatory,
Jacques Cassini, asserted on the basis of his own measure-
ments that the Earth has a prolate (lemon) shape.
To settle the dispute, in 1736 the French Academy of
Sciences sent surveying expeditions to Ecuador and
Lapland. However, distances cannot be measured per-
fectly, and the measurement errors at the time were large
enough to create substantial uncertainty. Several methods
were proposed for fitting a line through this data—that is,
to obtain the function (line) that best fit the data relating
the measured arc length to the latitude. It was generally
agreed that the method ought to minimize deviations in
the y-direction (the arc length), but many options were
available, including minimizing the largest such deviation
and minimizing the sum of their absolute sizes. The mea-
surements seemed to support Newton’s theory, but the
relatively large error estimates for the measurements left
too much uncertainty for a definitive conclusion (but this
was not immediately recognized). In fact, although
Newton was essentially right, later observations showed
that his prediction for excess equatorial diameter was
about 30 percent too large.
In 1805 the French mathematician Adrien-Marie
Legendre published the first known recommendation to
use the line that minimizes the sum of the squares of these
deviations (i.e., the modern least squares approximation).
The German mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss, who
may have used the same method previously, contributed
important computational and theoretical advances. The
method of least squares is now widely used for fitting lines
and curves to scatterplots (discrete sets of data).