
204 LIFE OF RICHARD III. CH. VI.
historian, but an essayist bent on justifying a paradox, and that
such a letter, if it really existed, was of very great service to
his argument. Taking all these circumstances into considera-
tion—together with the further possibility that the letter, even
if it existed, may have been misconstrued—we ought cer-
tainly to be pardoned for indulging a
belief,
or, at all events,
a charitable hope, that Elizabeth was incapable of sentiments
so dishonourable and repulsive.
At the same time it must be remarked that Buck's abstract
of the letter is very minute, and such as would seem to follow
pretty closely the turns of expression in a genuine original
1
;
that he expressly declares the MS. to be an autograph or
original draft; and that the horrible perversion and degra-
dation of domestic life which it implies is only too character-
istic of the age. Still, it would certainly appear from the
little we know of her after life that Elizabeth of York was
1
The following is Buck's account of it:—' When the midst and last of
February was past, the Lady Elizabeth, being more impatient and jealous
of the success than everyone knew or conceived, writes a letter to the
Duke of Norfolk intimating, first, that he was the man in whom she
affied, in respect of that love her father had ever bore him, &c. Then she
congratulates his many courtesies, in continuance of which she desires him
to be a mediator for her to the king in behalf of the marriage propounded
between them; who, as she wrote, was her only joy and maker in the
world, and that she was his in heart and thought; withal insinuating that
the better part of February was past, and that she feared the queen would
never die. All these be her own words, written with her own
hand,
and
this is the sum of her letter, which remains in the autograph or original
draft, under her own hand, in the magnificent cabinet of Thomas, Earl of
Arundel and Surrey.'—Kennetts England, i. 568. If the letter be not
simply a forgery palmed off upon Buck
himself,
or by him upon his
readers, I am inclined to think it was written, not by the Princess
Elizabeth, but by her mother the queen dowager, who bore the same
Christian name. Every word of it might just as well have come from
her, except the mention of her father, which may be a mistake; and
considering the weakness of which Elizabeth Woodville was actually
guilty in yielding to Richard III., there is nothing inconceivable in her
anxiety that he should marry her daughter.