
A.D.
1484. WILLIAM COLYNGBOURNE. 187
These particulars we quote from the words of Colyng-
bourne's indictment, extracted from an old register by Holin-
shed. The record also states that the proposal here referred
to was made 'about the 10th day of July, in the second year
of King Richard's reign, in the parish of St Botolph's, in
Portsoken ward.' This date seems to be an error in respect
of the year; for though Colyngbourne was not tried till the
second year of Richard III., the circumstances referred to
must have taken place in the first year
1
. St Luke's Day, the
18th of October, was the very day appointed for the outbreak
of Buckingham's rebellion, and Poole was the very place
where Henry attempted to land. Colyngbourne, therefore,
was one of the secret agents in the first great revolt against
Richard's authority ; and it is a remarkable evidence of the
hatred felt at this time towards the usurper, that the same
parties who desired to communicate with the Earl of Rich-
mond in Brittany, were anxious also to procure the assistance
of Lewis XI. of France against the King of England. For
it must be remarked that Lewis XL was then alive. The
time was at the very commencement of Richard's reign, just
after his coronation, when he had despatched a friendly mes-
sage to the French king, which the latter, probably, had not
even yet received
8
. Colyngbourne must have been almost the
very first man to make any move against the usurper. Richard
had not yet set out on his progress; the princes had not yet
1
This view presents only one difficulty, that the indictment, if given
accurately in Holinshed, represents Dorset to have been in Brittany with
the Earl of Richmond at the time. But the real date of the facts seems to
me so clear that unless we have here another error, either in Holinshed, or
in the indictment
itself,
I am disposed to think Dorset really was in Brittany
in July 1483. It is quite possible that he may have escaped thither with
the fleet he had fitted out just after the death of Edward IV., and that he
only returned to England shortly before Buckingham's rebellion. Colyng-
bourne's original indictment unfortunately is not now to be found among
the records of the Queen's Bench, though there is a reference to his
conviction on the Controlment Roll, 1 & 3 Richard III., Hilary.
2
Lewis's answer was dated July 11. Letters,
&°c.
i. 25.