
This example indicates that professionals can challenge institutionalised
ageism and sexism by drawing on strengths that people already display.
From the vignette, it is clear that the family, by its actions, had already
made this leap, even if the social worker did not. Had she recognised and
thereby validated Sukhev’s strengths, i.e., contribution to his mother’s
care, the social worker would have made him feel appreciated and coun-
tered the view that caring is exclusively women’s responsibility. That she
did not may have reflected the racist and sexist view that black men do not
care for their elders. The case above also illustrates how adults make deci-
sions for other adults which ignore the complex relationships between
them, and in the course of doing so, reinforce relations of dependency
and deny another individual’s right to agency. The processes of infantilis-
ing adults embedded these relationships rob all the persons involved of
their dignity.
The debate about the locality in which the care of older people is con-
ducted has been around for a while. In some respects, the division between
care in their own homes (community care) or in a residential institutions is
artificial (Finch, 1984). An institution can become the base for developing a
community of people with like-minded interests.
People’s shared experiences of living in one place and being subject to
its prevailing regimes can foster a sense of community (Goffman, 1961).
An institution, like a family dwelling, is located within a broader commu-
nity with which it interacts, even if only to obtain utilities and provide
communication avenues outward. Whether care is institutionally situated
or not, if the boundaries between the two are permeable, they are
constantly being constructed and reconstructed. If their permeability is
poor, isolation is more likely to occur as barriers impede high levels
of interaction between them. On the individual level, different experiences
of those boundaries are likely. Institutional walls become obstacles
if residents feel overcome by a lack of permeability and excluded by it.
Equally, a person left in their own home without community networks
and supports to tap into, may not feel part of a community, merely a
fragment of one – the isolated individual. Despite this possibility, social
policy emphasises community care. So, official policies and popular dis-
courses depict residential care for older people as second best to home
care. Yet, many problems in residential establishments can be traced to
poor levels of resourcing, inadequate staffing and lack of training for
their personnel (Wagner, 1988; Utting, 1991). Inadequate links between
institutional care and life in the wider community contributes to this sorry
situation.
Feminists argue that residential care need not be of poor quality (Finch,
1984). Properly resourced, staffed by competent individuals, and having
good connections with its surrounding communities, residential care for
older people can be creative and provide satisfying places in which
Working with Adults 131
0333_771540_Cha06.qxd 12/27/01 12:21 PM Page 131