Preface
list of those who provided technical reviews and critical comments over the years
reads like a
“Who’s
Who”
of mathematical geology and includes,
in
alphabetical
order, Frits Agterberg, Dave Best, Paul Brockington, Jim Campbell, Ted Chang,
Felix Chayes, Frank Ethridge, Je-an Fang, Colin Ferguson, John Griffiths, Jan
Harff,
Giinther Hausberger, Ute Herzfeld, George Koch, Michael McCullagh, Gerry Mid-
dleton, Vera Pawlowsky, Floyd Preston, Nick Rock, Robert Sampson, Paul Switzer,
Keith Turner, Leopold Weber, and Zhou
Di.
In
addition, there have been dozens
of others who have called or written to clarify a specific point or to bring an error
to my attention, or to suggest ways in which the text could be improved. To
all
of
these people, named and unnamed,
I
owe
my
deepest appreciation.
My esteem for my two mentors, Dan Merriam and John Harbaugh, was ex-
pressed
in
my dedication to the second edition of this book.
My
debt to these dear
friends
and
colleagues remains as large as ever. However, those to whom
I
owe the
greatest debt
of
gratitude
for
help with this
3rd
edition
are
my associates and co-
workers at the Kansas Geological Survey, particularly Ricardo Olea, John Doveton,
and David Collins, who have provided examples, data, and exercises, and who have
patiently reviewed specific topics with me in order to clarify my thoughts and to
help me correct my misconceptions and errors. Ricardo has been my guide through
the sometimes controversial field of geostatistics, and
John
has generously shared
the store of instructional material and student exercises that he has patiently as-
sembled through years of teaching petrophysics.
Most especially,
I
must acknowledge the assistance of Geoff Bohling, who vol-
unteered to shoulder the burden of reading every word in the manuscript, working
each example and exercise, and checking
all
of the computations and tables. Geoff
created many
of
the statistical tables in the Appendix from the basic equations of
distributions, and
all
of the calculations in the text have benefited from
his
careful
checking and verification.
Of
course, any errors that remain are the responsibility
of the author alone, but
I
would be remiss
if
I
did not acknowledge that the num-
ber of such remaining errors would be
far
greater if it were not for Geoff‘s careful
scrutiny.
I
would also like to note that
I
have benefited from the nurturing environment
of the Kansas Geological Survey
(KGS)
at The University of Kansas.
KU
has pro-
vided an intellectual greenhouse in which mathematical geology has flourished for
over
30
years.
I
especially wish to acknowledge the support and encouragement
of two previous directors of the Kansas Geological Survey,
Bill
Hambleton and Lee
Gerhard, who recognized the importance of geology’s quantitative aspects. Bill
had the foresight to realize that the massive, expensive mainframe dinosaurs of
computing
in
the
1960’s
would evolve into the compact, indispensable personal
tools of every working geologist, and his vision kept the
KGS
at the forefront of
computer applications. Mathematical geology advances, as does
all
of science, by
the cumulative efforts of individuals throughout the world who share a common
interest and who have learned that methodologies created in one part
of
the globe
will
find important applications elsewhere. Aware of this synergistic process, Lee
encouraged visits and exchanges with the world’s leaders in mathematical geology
and its related disciplines, creating a heady ferment of intellectual activity that re-
mains unique. It was with their support and encouragement that
I
have been able
to write the three editions
of
this book.
My
final
expression of gratitude is the deepest and is owed to
my
editor, lay-
out designer, proofreader, typesetter, reviewer, critic, companion, and source of
vii