
The action I may similarly be regarded as an explicit function of time, by
considering paths starting from a given point q
i
1 at a given instant t
1
, ending
at a given point q
i
2 at various times t
2
t:
I Iq
i
; t:
Then the total time derivative of I is
dI
dt
@I
@t
X
i
@I
@q
i
_
q
i
@I
@t
X
i
p
i
_
q
i
: 8:34
From the de®nition of the action, we have dI=dt L. Substituting this into Eq.
(8.34), we obtain
@I
@t
L ÿ
X
i
p
i
_
q
i
ÿH
or
@I
@t
Hq
i
; p
i
; t0: 8:35
Replacing the momenta p
i
in the Hamiltonian H by @I=@q
i
as given by Eq. (8.33),
we obtain the Hamilton±Jacobi equation
Hq
i
;@I=@q
i
; t
@I
@t
0: 8:36
For a conservative system with stationary constraints, the time is not contained
explicitly in Hamiltonian H,andH E (the total energy of the system).
Consequently, according to Eq. (8.35), the dependence of action I on time t is
expressed by the term ÿEt. Therefore, the action breaks up into two terms, one of
which depends only on q
i
, and the other only on t:
Iq
i
; tI
o
q
i
ÿEt: 8:37
The function I
o
q
i
is sometimes called the contracted action, and the Hamilton±
Jacobi equation (8.36) reduces to
Hq
i
;@I
o
=@q
i
E: 8:38
Example 8.8
To illustrate the method of Hamilton±Jacobi, let us consider the motion of an
electron of charge ÿe revolv ing about an atomic nucleus of charge Ze (Fig. 8.7).
As the mass M of the nucleus is much greater than the mass m of the electron, we
may consider the nucleus to remain stationary without making any very appreci-
able error. This is a cen tral force motion and so its motion lies entirely in one
plane (see Classical Mechanics, by Tai L. Chow, John Wiley, 1995). Employing
366
THE CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS