GST, calmodulin-binding peptide, His-, FLAG-tag, protein A, glycopro-
tein D of HSV), or to enable its detection and/or selection, i.e. tags based
on protein-reporters (-galactosidase, GFP, CAT, hGH) (Makrides,
1999). Tags can be fused to N- or C-terminal ends of the protein and a site
for proteolytic cleavage is commonly included to eliminate the tag upon
exploitation of its functionality. The proteases most commonly used are
thrombin, enterokinase, factor Xa, and TEV (catalytic domain of Nia, the
nuclear inclusion protein from tobacco etch virus).
Positioning effect and site-directed chromosomal integration. The
term ‘‘positioning effect’’ refers to the factors associated with the struct-
ural organization of the chromatin that have an influence on the rate of
transcription of a heterologous gene (Zahn-Zabal et al., 2001). These
factors involve the condensation state of the chromatin, the direction and
location of the foreign gene with respect to other genes, and the structural
elements in the chromosomes of the host cell (Wurm, 2004). It must be
emphasized that nearly 95% of chromatin appears as heterochromatin,
which is transcriptionally inactive. In contrast, the euchromatin is less
condensed and transcriptionally active, wherein gene expression is influ-
enced by structural elements (i.e. LCRs, SARs, insulators, boundaries) that
determine the transcription of the locus in a cell-specific and/or cell cycle-
dependent manner (Bode et al., 2003). Given that chromosomal integration
of a heterologous gene is a random process, it becomes easy to understand
why the chances for integration into a transcriptionally active region of the
genome are low and, hence, why the expression pattern of the recombinant
product is heterogeneous and gives rise to clonal variation.
At present, there are three different alternatives to overcome the
positioning effect: (i) use of expression vectors containing elements such as
insulators, boundaries, SARs, and LCRs, and conserved anti-repressor
elements whose function is to generate a transcriptionally favorable
environment at the integration site (Zahn-Zabal et al., 2001); (ii) the
addition of butyrate or tricostatin to the culture, which block the deacety-
lation of histones and induce a structural relaxation of the chromatin,
making sites that were transcriptionally inactive accessible (Gorman et al.,
1983); and (iii) site-directed chromosomal integration of the expression
cassette by means of the CRE/LoxP of bacteriophage P1 or FLP/FRT
systems (for details see Section 3.6.2).
Expression of multiple genes. In animal cells most of the mRNA is
monocistronic and encodes a single protein. In some circumstances, a
coordinated expression of two or more heterologous genes may be
required. This is the case for the establishment of a stable cell line using a
selection marker, for metabolic engineering, or for the expression of
protein complexes (i.e. antibodies). Some of the strategies used with that
aim include: (i) the expression from a single vector of multiple genes, each
one controlled by its own promoter; (ii) the creation of fusion proteins,
where the genes are placed in tandem and separated by linkers, the expres-
sion being controlled by a single promoter; (iii) the transfection with
multiple expression vectors, each one carrying a single and distinct gene
and selection marker; (iv) the expression of large monocistronic transcripts
containing the different cDNAs of each gene linked by sequences encod-
ing protease cleavage sites, i.e. furine protease, which will subsequently
Cloning and expression of heterologous proteins in animal cells 53