174 Thin fi lm growth
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2011
by a smooth change in the interlayer spacing. moreover, we also show
the buckling phase as a particular case of the HCPL ordering. Finally, we
show a very unstable colloidal arrangement, the pre-h phase, to explain the
transition nDÆ (n + 1)h.
The HCPL phase can be considered as a generalization of the HCP(100)
particle arrangement where the distance between linear strings of spheres is
well determined. However, this distance takes different values for the case
of the HCPL phase. Figure 7.22 shows SEM images of different particle
arrangements corresponding to (a) HCPL with a distance d ≈ 1.68 F, (b)
HCP(100) with a well-known distance d =
arrangements corresponding to (a) HCPL with a distance
arrangements corresponding to (a) HCPL with a distance
arrangements corresponding to (a) HCPL with a distance
arrangements corresponding to (a) HCPL with a distance
= 1.63F and (c) HCPL
with a distance d ≈ 1.52F. The HCPL phase has been observed in many
ordering transitions nD Æ (n + 1)h. Here we discuss the transition 2D Æ
3h. This will help us to understand better the HCPL phase, and also it would
allow us to introduce the pre-3h phase. the analysis of their corresponding
optical spectra, and the comparison to the sEm images (see Fig. 7.23), allows
us to make an accurate assignment of the particle arrangement. optical
features in the re ectance also show gradual changes. Firstly, as the system
transits between 2 and 3 monolayers a new oscillation period gradually
appears. secondly, the Bragg diffraction peak absent in the 2h facet, clearly
emerges in the 2D arrangement (at l = 1.7 µm). Then, for the 2HCPL phase,
it shifts at longer wavelength values and smoothly fades out (at around l =
2.2 mm) when the light spot approaches the 3h ordering. Recently, schöpe
et al. (2006) have described two and three buckling phases in wet colloidal
crystal thin lms, that in fact correspond to HCPL phase we are describing
here.
Figure 7.24 shows the calculated lling fraction in the 2Δ Æ 3h transition.
Here we show how the different facets evolve as the cell gap increases.
(a) (b) (c)
2 µm 2 µm 2 µm
7.22 SEM images of different particle arrangements (a) HCPL d ª
1.68F, (b) HCP(100) d =
F = 1.63F and (c) HCPL d ª 1.52F,
d being the distance between linear strings of spheres and F the
sphere diameter. From Ramiro-Manzano et al. (2007) with permission
of the Americal Physical Society (APS).
ThinFilm-Zexian-07.indd 174 7/1/11 9:41:47 AM