Jenkins D, Richard MG and Daigger GT (1993) Manual on
the Causes and Control of Activated Sludge Bulking and
Foaming, 2nd edn. Chelsea, MI: Lewis.
Richard MG (1989) Activated Sludge Microbiology.
Alexandria, VA: The Water Pollution Control Federation.
Stover EL (1994) Control of Opportunistic Filamentous
Bacteria in Activated Sludge Treatment of Food Process-
ing Waste Waters. Environmentally Responsible Food
Processing, AICHE Symposium Series, vol. 90, p. 42.
Stover EL and Campana CK (1990) Operational Process
Control for High Carbohydrate Filamentous Bulking.
Proceedings of the 1990 Food Industry Environmental
Conference and Exhibition. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Tech
Research Institute.
Stover EL and Gaden TB (1999) Filamentous Bacteria Iden-
tification. Proceedings of the WEFTEC
1
99 Workshop
#110 – Waste Water Microbiology, New Orleans, LA.
USEPA (1987) Summary Report – The Causes and Control
of Activated Sludge Bulking and Foaming. Cincinnati,
OH: US Environmental Protection Agency.
Disposal of Waste Water
E L Stover, Stover & Associates, Inc., Stillwater,
OK, USA
T H Eckhoff, M&M/Mars, Inc., Hackettstown, NJ, USA
Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Introduction
0001 Waste waters produced from food-processing oper-
ations vary in general based on the class or type of
food processes; however, they share many common
characteristics. These common characteristics typic-
ally allow biological treatment processes to be used
for food-processing waste waters prior to discharge
to the environment or prior to recycle and reuse.
Water quality standards and criteria have been
developed, and are constantly being refined and up-
graded for discharge and use requirements. Existing
and new environmental laws are being enforced to
protect the aquatic environment from effluent dis-
charges. The newer regulations and approaches em-
phasize watershed-based water quality initiatives and
ecological risk assessment. Waste minimization and
waste reuse approaches are being emphasized.
Characteristics of Food-Processing
Waste Water
0002 The food-processing industry is highly diverse; this
diversity is reflected in the enormous variety of
food items produced worldwide. In general, the
classes of food processors include bakeries, candy
manufacturers, meat processors, breweries, specialty
convenience-type food processors, baby food manu-
facturers, fruit and vegetable processors, and dairies.
Each type of food-processing facility has waste water
problems endemic to the specific processes involved
and to the particular product; however, there are
common characteristics of nearly all food-processing
waste waters. Refer to individual food processes.
0003The primary waste water pollutants associated
with the food-processing industry are food product,
raw materials, solvents, detergents, cleaning agents,
and disinfectants. These constituents give rise to high
biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen
demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSS), total
dissolved solids (TDS), nutrients (primarily nitrogen
and phosphorus), pH, oil and grease, and color. In
general, food-processing waste waters by their nature
contain few, if any, toxic constituents. The US Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) requirements pre-
clude the use of hazardous or toxic constituents in
the preparation and processing of food products.
However, these same regulations often require a
food processor to clean and disinfect equipment and
facilities with compounds that could be problematic
during waste water treatment. For example, products
that contain quarternary ammonium compounds,
which have a strong disinfectant capacity, can pose
a problem during waste water treatment if used
indiscriminately for production equipment cleaning.
For the most part, food-processing waste waters are
not considered to be hazardous to human health. A
common factor in food-processing waste waters is the
enormous volume of effluent generated. Water is used
as an ingredient in many foods, and in all parts of the
food-processing operation, including product wash-
ing, blanching, cooking, cooling, diluting, cleaning,
and sanitation. The total volume of water discharged
daily may vary greatly, from 2650 m
3
day
1
for a
bakery to 2.65 10
6
m
3
day
1
for a cannery of
comparable size.
0004Food-processing industries generally dispose of
their waste water by treatment prior to discharge
directly to a receiving stream, a publicly owned treat-
ment works (POTW), or land application site. Most
food-processing plants utilize a biological treatment
system to treat their waste water. These systems
include aerobic and anaerobic processes, either inde-
pendently or in combination. Because of the nontoxic
nature of the waste water generated in the food-
processing industry, this approach is generally very
effective. Some of the disadvantages associated with
biological treatment include the generation of bio-
logical sludge which must be disposed of, the require-
ment of a skilled treatment system operator, and the
sensitivity of biological systems to climatic change or
EFFLUENTS FROM FOOD PROCESSING/Disposal of Waste Water 1985