Carl Hoseney R (1994) Principles of Cereal Science and
Technology, 2nd edn. Minnesota: American Association
of Cereal Chemists.
FAO/GIEWS Food Outlook No 5, November 2000, page 4.
FAO/WHO Experts consultation. Carbohydrates in human
nutrition, 2nd edn. (1998) FAO. Food and Nutrition
Paper. Rome: FAO.
Garrow JS, James WPT and Ralph A (2000) Human Nutri-
tion and Dietetics, 10th edn, pp. 333–348. London:
Churchill Livingstone.
Henry RJ and Kettlewell PS (1996) Cereal Grain Quality.
London: Chapman and Hall.
Holland B, Welch AA, Unwin ID, Buss DH, Paul AA and
Southgate DA (1991) The Composition of Foods,5thedn.
London: Royal Society of Chemistry and MAFF.
Kent NL and Evers AD (1994) Technology of Cereals and
Introduction for Students of Food Science and Agricul-
ture, 4th edn. Oxford: Pergamon.
Kulp K and Ponte JG (2000) Handbook of Cereal Science
and Technology, 2nd edn. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1997) Total
Diet Study – Aluminium, Arsenic, Cadmium,
Chromium, Copper, Lead, Mercury, Nickel, Selenium,
Tin and Zinc. Food Surveillance Information Sheet
no. 191. (http://archive.food.gov.uk/maff/archive/food/
infsheet/1999/no191/191tds.htm)
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (2000)
National Food Survey. London: The Stationery Office.
Bulk Storage of Grain
D Richard-Molard, INRA, Nantes, France
Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Introduction
0001 At the beginning of the 21st century, world produc-
tion of cereal grains is about 1600 million tonnes.
This represents by far the greatest production of
staple food material, the second most important
source, i.e., tuber-producing crops, being far behind,
with a total production of less than 100 million
tonnes of edible dry matter. A simple arithmetic cal-
culation shows that cereal crops will be able to pro-
vide more than the 1.3 kg of bread or rice per day for
all of the 6000 million world population, provided
that postharvest losses are minimized.
0002 Whatever the political problems and ethnic questions,
two essential facts must be taken into account: cereals
(mainly wheat and maize) are produced in excess in only
a limited number of countries, and only during limited
periods in the year. Good and safe storage would allow
consumption to be delayed and grain to be exported
anywhere throughout the year and is, therefore, of pri-
mary economic, political, and social importance.
Existing Losses of Cereal Crops
0003It is difficult, if not impossible, to calculate accurately
the postharvest losses resulting from poor storage
conditions and inadequate practices. However, in
1976 it was estimated that losses of grain could rep-
resent a commercial value up to US$4000 million.
0004Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) reports
generally indicate that percentage losses remain at
rather low levels in industrialized countries, probably
never more than 1 or 2%, whereas they can reach
very high levels, maybe 50% or even more, in coun-
tries where climatic conditions are unfavorable and
modern storage equipment is lacking. It is important,
however, to realize that, in developed countries,
low percentage levels of loss involve enormous quan-
tities of grain, leading to problems of significant
economical importance. By contrast, high levels of
losses in developing areas apply in most cases to
only limited quantities of stored cereals, raising
questions of vital importance only for the populations
concerned.
0005It must also be emphasized that losses in grain
quality can occur without significant losses of dry
matter, e.g., decreases of nutritional value, losses
of vitamins or essential fatty acids, appearance of
toxicity, off-flavors or discolorations due to micro-
biological activity and insect pest infestation. The
assessment of such hidden losses remains impossible
at the present time.
0006In every situation it is of primary importance to
have the best understanding of local environmental,
economic, climatic, and ethnic conditions, and appre-
ciation of possible causes of grain deterioration
during storage, in order to minimize losses.
0007Some basic questions still lack satisfactory tech-
nical or economic answers but, usually, it can be
said that postharvest losses are mostly due to lack of
adequate training of the people who handle and store
the grain. Most significant losses generally result
from insect infestation or from the growth of micro-
organisms. To a lesser extent, biochemical changes in
the grain itself can also be important.
0008The causes and extent of grain losses may differ
widely from one place to another. They depend on
many parameters but three major environmental
factors determine the extent of damage in a given
situation: the water content of the grain, the mean
temperature of the bulk, and the duration of storage.
Of these factors, water is by far the most important
and also the most interesting because it can be
managed; whereas it is very difficult to control tem-
perature in practice. (See Storage Stability: Mechan-
isms of Degradation; Parameters Affecting Storage
Stability.)
1014 CEREALS/Bulk Storage of Grain