The tragedies King Lear (ca. 1605) and Macbeth
(ca. 1606) are mature examples of Shakespeare’s
turn toward the darker themes of murder and
madness and how they relate to politics (both title
characters are national leaders who lose their minds
and lives). Othello (ca. 1604), Antony and Cleopatra
(ca. 1606–07), and, of course, Hamlet (ca. 1600)
are considered to be among the greatest achieve-
ments in world literature. All of these plays depict
the demise of military or royal figures, honorable
men who are fatally flawed or self-destructive.
The final works of Shakespeare’s career are best
described as “problem plays” or tragicomedies—
dramatic stories that combine elements of both
tragedy and comedy while exploring the complex-
ities of human existence. The Winter’s Tale (ca.
1610–11) and The Tempest (ca. 1611) address a va-
riety of issues, ranging from the personal (parent-
hood, friendship, and ambition) to the social
(politics, sexuality, and slavery).
In his plays, Shakespeare developed what today
has become recognized as a modern understanding
of human character. The critic Joel Fineman credits
Shakespeare with inventing the psychological view of
the self that is assumed in modern thought. Harold
Bloom, in a similar vein,has argued that Shakespeare
is responsible for “the invention of the human.”
One of the themes that Shakespeare develops in
depth is the complicated relationship between the
outer self and the inward self. In Hamlet, Queen
Gertrude, Hamlet’s mother, attempts to convince
her son that it is time to stop mourning for his
dead father. When she asks Hamlet why he seems
to mourn so deeply, he replies:
’Tis not alone my inky cloak, good mother,
Nor customary suits of solemn black,...
That can denote me truly. These indeed seem,
For they are actions that a man might play;
But I have that within which passes show,
These but the trappings and the suits of woe.
Hamlet begins this speech assuring his mother
of the authenticity of his behavior. He does not
seem to mourn; he truly mourns. His exterior, the
way he dresses in mourning for his dead father,
cannot reveal his true inner self, just as outward
signs—sighs, tears, and dejected behavior—cannot
truly represent that which is within: the human
spirit, or individual identity.
While much criticism has been and continues
to be written about Hamlet’s character, one might
assume that Shakespeare intended Hamlet to rep-
resent his opinion that the “outward” person can
never be anything more than an inauthentic repre-
sentation of the “inward.” This, in turn, reflects the
disappearance of the traditional social order taking
place in England at the time.
Perhaps the play that best represents Shake-
speare’s understanding of social change is King Lear,
in which an elderly king, who is foolishly taken in by
his daughters’flattery, relinquishes his power and ul-
timately loses not only his throne but also his sense
of self. The playwright reflects how the medieval
monarchical system, in which power passed in an or-
derly way from father to son and position was es-
sentially fixed at birth, was being called into question
by ambitious individuals seeking to reinvent them-
selves—and sometimes succeeding. Lear’s tragedy is,
thus, an English
TRAGEDY, a national problem.
Although Shakespeare was not the only play-
wright to write about this problem, his drama is
unique because he is able to address social issues
through stories about individual people, like Lear
and Macbeth. A theme that runs through both is
that thirst for power corrupts. While Elizabeth in
the final years of the 16th century was relatively se-
cure, members of the aristocracy were in constant
fear of losing their power, money, and lives. Shake-
speare suggests that these threats are more than
just individual problems. Rather, they are at the
heart of social unrest and damage the nation as a
whole. When Lear loses his sense of reality, we are
meant to question what happens when non-kings
can gain power through evil deeds.
What differentiates Shakespeare’s most memo-
rable and lifelike characters from those of other
Elizabethan dramatists is their self-awareness.
Renowned scholar Harold Bloom considers Sir
John Falstaff—of the history plays Henry IV, parts
one and two, Henry V, Henry VI part one, and The
Merry Wives of Windsor—to be, along with Hamlet,
Shakespeare, William 267