objectivismo
In the later half of the 20th century, objectivismo
was a movement in Spain that was closely related
to the French
NEW NOVEL and particularly to the
writings of Alain ROBBE-GRILLET and José Camilo
CELA. Objectivismo, or objectivism, refers to the at-
tempt to write novels that were completely free of
subjective material and, therefore, closer to mate-
rial reality. This involved the rejection of all con-
ventional modes of narrative literature such as
plot, chronological progression, and metaphorical
description. The novels of objectivismo would, for
example, feature extravagant, long descriptions of
a piece of furniture or a geographic location and
then repeat the same descriptions periodically
throughout the book. Cela’s La Colmena (The
Hive, 1951) is a prime example.
Strongly influenced by existential philosophy of
Heidegger, the main point of objectivismo is that re-
ality, before human interpretation, is just there. Be-
fore any of the narrative meaning that human
beings give to it, the most important feature of real-
ity is its simple presence.
By refusing to concentrate on action or mean-
ing, objectivismo texts have a sort of physical pres-
ence, in the philosophical sense of the word
physical. More important, the texts imply that the
author and human personality are essentially illu-
sions. By an aesthetic act of will, the author may
overcome these illusions and present a text free of
his presence. The novels of Rafael Sánchez Ferlosio
(1924– ), such as El Jarama (1956; translated as
The One Day of the Week, 1962), and the early work
of Juan Marsé, are examples.
Literary critic Roland Barthes was a major influ-
ence on both the New Novel and objectivismo. He
believed that too much importance had been given
to the author’s intentions in interpreting literature.
He argued that, in fact, meaning, specifically the in-
tentional meaning of the author, was an imperma-
nent and changing thing based more on cultural
context than anything else. Objectivismo is a literary
style that supports and is supported by this idea.
The novels of objectivismo are texts that push the
reader to supply interpretations. They are presented
with compressed and repetitive events that are ex-
plained only in glimmers so that any meaning the
reader gleans will not be definitive.
A Work about Objectivismo
Robbe-Grillet, Alain. For a New Novel: Essays on Fic-
tion. Translated by Richard Howard. New York:
Grove Press, 1966.
¯
Oe Kenzaburo¯
(1935– ) novelist
O
¯
e Kenzabur¯o was born in a small village in Ehime
Prefecture on the island of Shikoku. By the time he
entered school, Japan was at war, so he underwent
strict moral training intended to instill unquestion-
ing loyalty to the emperor. Before the end of the war,
his father died, leaving him in the care of his
mother. Under her guidance,
¯
Oe developed an in-
terest in literature, including Western novels. In
1954, he formalized that interest, entering the
French literature department of Tokyo University.
While at Tokyo University,
¯
Oe began to write
plays for a student drama group. In 1957, he con-
verted one of his plays into a short story, “A Pecu-
liar Occupation,” about a student who takes on a
part-time job of exterminating dogs used for ex-
periments. That story brought him to the attention
of established writers, and he quickly found accept-
ance in the literary world. During the next two
years, he published a number of stories, including
Nip the Buds, Shoot the Kids, about a group of aban-
doned boys, which won the Akutagawa Prize, en-
suring
¯
Oe’s place among the literati.
¯
Oe increasingly became politically active, no-
tably opposing nuclear proliferation and the
Japan–United States Mutual Security Treaty. His po-
litical concerns carried over into his writing and, in
1961, parodying a 17-year-old extremist who had
assassinated a leader of a Socialist faction, he wrote
the short story “Seventeen.”
¯
Oe’s literary career took a radical turn in 1963.
Three years after his marriage to Itami Yukari, the
sister of renowned film director Itami J¯uz¯o, his
son Hikari was born with a birth defect that
damaged his brain. From this point,
¯
Oe turned to
more personal reflection in his writing.
O
¯
e Kenzaburo¯ 331