of writing in the same manner as the scientist ap-
proaches the study of nature.
Proponents of naturalism believe that both
hereditary and environmental influences combine
to determine human behavior. For a writer to de-
pict life as it really is, the ultimate goal of natural-
ist literature, he or she must present characters
whose motivations can be clearly understood
based on the surrounding causes. In other words,
Zola and those who followed him replaced the
classical idea of fate as the major factor behind
human circumstances with the more scientific
concept of determinism in which human beings
are responsible for their own actions. Thus, some,
if not all, human values can be seen to proceed in
direct relationship to situational needs such as
food, water, and shelter, placed in combination
with environmental, sociological and psychologi-
cal factors. The literature of the naturalist school,
therefore, dealt more commonly with the obser-
vation of reality as it actually presents itself than
with the construction of elaborate fantasies.
Naturalism in literature developed as a direct
response to ROMANTICISM. Dissatisfaction with the
representations of social conditions in literature
led to a desire on the part of certain writers to
create a body of work that stood in more direct
correlation to actual life. Romanticism focused
on high lyricism and was concerned with the
beauty of language and self-expression, human
emotions and personal values. Naturalism, on the
other hand, was more concerned with cause-and-
effect relationships and logical outcomes to given
circumstances. This trend was not entirely new;
Realism had anticipated some of these concerns.
However, naturalism was also a reaction to
REALISM. The naturalists believed that realist liter-
ature, while it sought to portray life accurately,
was not a true representation of the harsh reali-
ties faced by the lower social classes. Whereas the
realists displayed a tendency within their work to
aestheticize societal problems, making them more
palatable to the bourgeois readership, naturalists
developed more accurate portrayals of reality,
making no attempt to pass judgment or to
suggest a solution. They abandoned religion and
philosophy, believing neither discipline capable
of effecting change on society. Instead, they be-
lieved that literature had the power to create
change simply by making the reader aware of the
extent of the problem.
Common, therefore, among naturalist works is
the emphasis on characters who are poor, undere-
ducated, and trapped in lives filled with filth and
corruption. These are the people whose lives are
most controlled by social and cultural influences
and whose decisions are most affected by the ful-
fillment of basic needs. As a result, much natural-
ist literature is a dreary representation of the harsh
realities of life. Although similar to realism in
many ways, naturalism goes beyond realism in its
belief that social and biological factors take the
place of free will entirely, as can be witnessed in the
trappings of lower-class existence.
In addition to Zola, other noted French natu-
ralists include the
GONCOURT brothers, J. K. HUYS-
MANS, and Guy de MAUPASSANT. The Goncourts’
works, such as Soeur Philomène (1861) and Renée
Mauperin (1864; translated 1887) were based
largely on notes from their travels and presented
an accurate vision of life as they observed it. Prior
to his absorption in DECADENCE, Huysmans’s early
works, such as Marthe (1876), can also be classified
as naturalist pieces.
In the theater, the naturalist movement is
most closely associated with the Théâtre Libre
movement of the late 19th century. Again, the goal
of drama, like that of literature, became the desire
to represent life as accurately as possible. By plac-
ing a greater degree of emphasis on scenic design,
which was realistically detailed, and costume
design, which reflected the style and quality of
the characters, as well as the development and
encouragement of more natural acting methods,
the movement was an attempt to break free from
the conventions of artificial theatricality prevalent
in the past.
The naturalist movement in France did not
confine itself to one art form but existed in
theatrical performances and the visual arts as
naturalism 315