Borovik A. Shadows of the Truth: Metamathematics of Elementary Mathematics

Подождите немного. Документ загружается.

References 255

605. M. T. Battista, Spatial visualization and gender differences in high

school geometry. J. Res. Math. Ed. 21 (1990), 47–6 0.

606. A. W. Bell, A study of pup ils’ proof explanations in mathematical sit-

uations, Ed. Stud. Math. 7 (1976), 23–40.

607. A. Bell, E. Fischbein, and B. Greer, Ch oi ce of operati on in verbal

arithmetic problems: the effects of number size, problem structure

and context, Ed. Stud. Math. 15, no. 2 (1984), 129–147. Stable URL:

http://www.jstor.org/stable/3482245.

608. A. J. Bishop, Use of structural ap p aratus and spatial ability: A possi-

ble relationship. Research in Education 9 (1973), 43—49.

609. A. J. Bishop, Spatial abilities and mathematics education: A review.

Ed. Stud. Math. 11 (1980), 257–269.

610. M. R. Boelkins, Removable ambiguities: making mathemat-

ics more intelligible, Primus 8 no. 4 (1998), 331–339. DOI:

10.1080/10511979808965908.

611. A. V. Borovik, Boyutsal a naliz veya elmalari ın sanlara bülmek,

Matematik Dünyası no. 2 (2008), 71–76.

612. G. M. Boulton-Lewis, Young children’s representations and strategies

for subtraction. British J. Ed. Psychology 63 (1993), 441–456.

613. G. M. Boulton-Lewis and K. Tait, Young children’s representations

and s trategies for addition. British J. Ed. Psychology 64 (1994), 231–

242.

614. T. Brown, Hermeneutics a nd mathematical activity, Ed. Stud. Math.

22, no. 5 (1991), 475–480. Sta ble URL: http://www.jstor.org/

stable/3482466.

615. L. Burton, Mathematical thinking: The struggle for meaning, J.

Research Math. Ed. 15 (1984), 35–49. Stable URL: http://www.

jstor.org/stable/748986.

616. L. Burton, The practices of mathematicians: What do they tell us

about coming to know mathematics? Ed. Stud. Math. 37 ( 1999), 121–

143.

617. L. Bu rton and C. Morgan, Mathematicians writing, J. Research in

Math. Ed. 31 , no. 4 (2000) , 429–453. Stable URL: http://www.

jstor.org/stable/749652.

618. J. Cai, Assessing and understanding U.S. and Chin es e stu d ents’

mathematical thinking. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik

34 no. 6 (2002), 278–290.

619. K. H. Canobi, Individual differences in children’s addition and sub-

traction knowledge, Cognitive Development 19 (2004), 81–93. DOI:

10.1016/j.cogdev.2003. 10.001.

620. T. P. Carpenter, J. Hiebert, and J. M. Moser, Problem structure and

ﬁrst-grade children’s initial solution processes for simpl e ad dition

and subtraction problems, J. Research Math. Ed. 12 (1981), 27–39.

621. T. Carpenter and J. Moser, The acquisition of addition and subtrac-

tion concepts in grades one through three, J. Research Math. Ed. 15,

no. 3 (19 84), 179–202.

622. D. Carraher, B. M. Brizuela and D. Earnest, The reiﬁcation of addi-

tive differences in early algebra: Viva La Diférence! In: Proceed ings

of the 12t h ICMI study conference: The future of the teaching

and learning of algebra (H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, and J. Vi-

cent, eds.). Melbourne, Australia : The University of Melbourne, 2001,

pp. 16 3–170.

SHADOWS OF THE TRUTH VER. 0.813 23-DEC-2010/7:19

 ALEXANDRE V. BOROVIK

256 References

623. E. Carruthers and M. Worthington, Research uncovers children’s cre-

ative mathematical thinki ng, Primary Math. 7, no. 3 (2003), 21–25.

624. E. Carruthers and M. Worthington, Young children exploring early

calculation, Math. Teaching 187 (2004), 21–25. ISSN 0025-5785.

625. E. Carruthers and M. Worthington, Children’s Mathematics:

Making Marks, Making Mea ning. Sage Publications, 2006. ISBN-

10: 1412922836. ISBN-13: 978-141292283 8.

626. E. Carruthers and M. Worthington, Children’s mathematical graph-

ics: understanding the key concept, Primary Math. 13, no. 3 ( 2009),

3–5.

627. Y. Chevallard, La transposition didactique – Du savoir savant

au savoir enseig né. La Pensée sauvage, Grenoble, 1985.

628. R. Cowan and S. Bid dle, Children’s understanding of one-to-one cor-

respondence in the context of s haring, Ed. Psych. 9, no. 2 (1989), 133–

140.

629. R. Cowan and M. Renton, Do they know what they are doing? Chi l-

dren’s use of economic addi tion strategies and knowledge of commu-

tativity. Educational Psychology 16 (199 6), 407–420.

630. C. M. Diezmann and J. J. Watters, Identifying and supporting spatial

intelligence in young children, Contemp. Issues in Early Childhood

1, no. 3 (2000), 299– 313.

631. P. C. Dowling, Discipline and Mathematise: The myth of relevance in

education, Perspectives in Education 16 no. 2 (1995), 209–226.

632. P. C. Dowling, A sociological analysis of school mathematics texts, Ed.

Stud. Math. 31 (1996), 389–415.

633. P. C. Dowlin g, The Sociology of Mathematics E ducation: Math-

ematical Myths/Pe dagogic Te xts. Routledge, 1997. ISBN-10:

0750707917. ISBN-13: 978-0750707916.

634. E. Dubinsky, Constructive aspects of reﬂective abstraction in ad-

vanced mathematics, in Epistemo lo gical Foundations of Math-

ematical Experience (L. P. Steffe, ed.). Springer-Verlag, New York,

1991, pp. 160–187.

635. E. Dubinsky, K. Weller, M. McDonald, an d A. Brown, Some histor-

ical issues and paradoxes regarding the inﬁnity concept: an APOS

analysis, Part 1, Ed. Stud. Math. 58 (2005 ), 335–359.

636. E. Dubinsky, K. Weller, M. McDonald, an d A. Brown, Some histor-

ical issues and paradoxes regarding the inﬁnity concept: an APOS

analysis, Part 2, Ed. Stud. Math. 60 (2005 ), 253–266.

637. T. Eisenberg, On u nderstanding the reluctance to visualize, Zentral-

blatt f ür Didaktik der Mathematik, 26, no. 4 (1994), 109–113.

638. T. Eisenberg, Prime knowledge about primes, Teaching Mathemat-

ics and its Applications 26 no. 2 (200 7), 56–72. DOI: 10.1093/tea-

mat/hrl018.

639. R. Ely, Nonstandard student conceptions about inﬁ nitesimals. J. Res.

Math. Ed. no. 2 (2010 ) 117–146.

640. L. D. English, Young chil d ren’s combinatoric strategies, Ed. Stud.

Math. 22, no. 5 (1991), 451–474.

641. L. D. Engli sh, Children’s strategies in solving two- an d three-

dimensional combinatorial problems, J. Research Math. Ed. 24, no.

3 (1993) , 255–273. Sta ble URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/

3482465.

SHADOWS OF THE TRUTH VER. 0.813 23-DEC-2010/7:19

 ALEXANDRE V. BOROVIK

References 257

642. P. Ernest, Mathematical induction: a pedagogical discuss ion, Ed.

Stud. Math. 15, no. 2 (1984), 173–189 .

643. W. V. Fabricius, C. Sophian, and H. M. Wel lman, Young children’s

sensitivity to logical necessity in their inferential search behaviour,

Child Development 58 (19 87), 409–423.

644. L. M. Flevares and M. Perry, How many do you see? The use of

nonspoken representations in ﬁrst-grade mathematics lessons. J. Ed.

Psych. 93 (2001), 330–345.

645. H. Freudenthal, Geometry between the devil and the deep sea. Edu-

cational Studies in Mathematics 3 (1971), 413– 435.

646. H. Freudenthal, Mathematics as an Educational Task. Reidel,

Dordrecht, 1973 .

647. H. Freudenthal, Didactical Phenomenology of Mathematical

Structures. Springer, 1986. ISBN-13: 978-90277226 14.

648. H. Freudenthal, Revisiting Mathematics Education. Kluwer,

1991.

649. K. C. Fuson, D. Wearne, J. C. Hiebert, H. G. Murray, P. G. Human,

A. I. Olivier, T. P. Carpenter, and E. Fennema, Children’s conceptual

structures for multidigit numbers and methods of multidigit addition

and sub traction, J. Research Math. Ed. 28, no. 2 (1997), 130–162.

Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/749759.

650. Équipe Galion, Mathématiques 6e. Programme 1977. Ocdl-

Hatier, 1980.

651. A. Gardiner, Mathematical Puzzling, UK Mathematics Founda-

tion, Birmingham, 19 96. ISBN 0-7 044-17545.

652. A. Gardiner, Disc overing Mathematics. The Art of Investiga-

tion. Dover Publi cations, Inc., Mineola, NY, 2007. xiv+206 pp. ISBN:

0-486-45299-9. MR2351062

653. A. Gardiner, Understanding Inﬁnity. The Mathematics of Inﬁ-

nite Processes. Dover Publ ications, Inc., Mineola, NY, 2002. x+308

pp. ISBN: 0-486-4 2538-X.

654. R. Gelman, E. Meck, and S. Merkin, Young children’s numerical com-

petence, Cognitive Development 1 (1986), 1–29.

655. H. P. Ginsburg, Children’s Arithmetic: How They L e arn It and

How You Teach It. P ro-Ed, 1989. ISBN-10: 0890791813. ISBN-13:

978-0890791813.

656. I. Grattan-Guinness, Not from nowhere. History and philosophy be-

hind mathematical education. Int. J. Math. Ed. Sci. Tech. 4 (1973),

421–453.

657. E. Gray and D. Tall, Duality, ambiguity and ﬂexibility: A proceptual

view of simple arithmetic. J. Research Math. Ed. 26, no. 2 (1994),

115–141.

658. H.B. Grifﬁths, Mathematics: Society and Curricula. Cam-

bridge University Press, 1974. ISBN-10: 0521202876. ISBN-13: 978-

0521202879.

659. G. J. Groen and L. B. Resnick, Can preschool children invent addition

algorithms? J. Educational Psychology 69 (1977), 645–652.

660. D. F. Halpern, C. P. Benbow, D. C. Geary, R. C. Gur, J. S. Hyde, and

M. A. Gernbacher, The science of sex differences in science an d math-

ematics, Psychological Sci. in the Pu blic Interest 8 (2007), 1–51.

SHADOWS OF THE TRUTH VER. 0.813 23-DEC-2010/7:19

 ALEXANDRE V. BOROVIK

258 References

661. G. Hanna, H. N. Jahnke, Y. DeBruyna, and D. Lomas. Teaching math-

ematical proofs that rely on ideas from physics. Canadian J. Science,

Mathematics and Technology Education 1 no. 2 (20 01) 183–192. DOI:

10.1080/14926150109556460.

662. G. Harel and D. Tall, The general, the abstract and the generic in

advanced mathematics, For the Learning of Math. 11, no. 1 (1991),

38–42.

663. M. Hegarty and M. Kozhevnikov, Types of visual-spatial represen-

tations and mathematical problem solving, J. Ed. Psych. 91, no. 4

(1999), 684–689.

664. R. Hersh, Proof is convincing and explaining, Ed. Stud. Math. 24

(1993), 389–399.

665. R. Hersh, Independent thin king, College Math. J. 34, no. 2 (2003),

112–115.

666. R. Hershkowitz, Visualization in geometry: Two sides of the coin . Fo-

cus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 11 (1989) 61–76.

667. J. Hiebert, The position of the unknown set and children’s solutions

of verbal arithmetic problems, J. Res. Math. Ed. 13, no. 5 (1982), 341–

349. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/749008.

668. J. Hiebert and D. Wearne, Instruction, understanding and skill in

multidigit a d dition and subtraction. Cognition and Instruction, 14

(1996), 251–283.

669. J. Hoffman, C. Johnson, A. Logg, Dreams of Calculus: Pe r-

spectives on Mat hematics Education. 2004. http://www.

bodysoulmath.org/books/dreams-of-calculus.pdf.

670. D. Holton, A. Ahmed, H. Williams, and C. Hill, On the importance of

mathematical play, Internat. J. Math. Ed. Sci. Technology 32, no. 3

(2001), 43–56.

671. C. Hoyles, The curricular shaping of students’ approaches to proof.

For the Learning of Mathematics 17 no. 1 (1997) 7–16.

672. C. Hoyles and R. Noss (eds.), Learning Mathematics and Logo.

MIT P ress, 1992. ISBN-10: 026208 2071. ISBN-1 3: 978-0262082075.

673. M. Hughes, Can preschool children add and subtract?, Educa tional

Psychology 1 ( 1981), 207 –220.

674. F. Ilg and L. B. Ames, Developmental trends in arithmetic, Journal

of Genetic Psychology 79 (1951), 3–28.

675. L. S. Kanevsky, Pursuing qualitative differences in the ﬂexible use of

a problem solving strategy by young children. J. Ed. Gifted 13 ( 1990),

115–140.

676. A. Khait, The deﬁnition of mathematics: philosophical and pedagog-

ical aspects, Sci. Ed. 14 (2005 ), 137–159.

677. C. Kieran, Concepts associated with the equal ity s ymbol, Ed. Stud.

Math. 12 (1981), 317–32 6.

678. S. S. Kutateladze, Nomination and deﬁnition, http://www.math.

nsc.ru/LBRT/g2/english/ssk/nomination_e.html.

679. P. E. Langford, A longitudinal study of chil d ren’s understanding of

logical laws in ari thmetic and Boolean algebra, Educational Psychol-

ogy 1 (1981), 119–140 .

680. C. Lean and M. A. Clements, Spatial ability, visual imagery, and

mathematical performance, Ed. Stu d . Math. 12 (1981), 267–299.

SHADOWS OF THE TRUTH VER. 0.813 23-DEC-2010/7:19

 ALEXANDRE V. BOROVIK

References 259

681. D. Lau gwitz, Motivations and linear algebra, Ed. Stud. Math. 5

(1974), 243–254.

682. S. Lerman, Problem-solving or knowledge centered: The inﬂuence of

philosophy on mathematics teaching. International J. Mathematics

Education, 14 no. 1 (1983), 59–66.

683. S. Lerman, Intersubjectivity in mathematics learning: a challenge to

the radical constructivist pa radigm? J. Research Math. Ed. 27, no. 2

(1996), 133–150.

684. G. Leversha, Crossing the Bridge. United Kingdom Mathematics

Trust, 2008. ISBN 978-1-906001- 06-3.

685. P. Liebeck, How Children Learn Mathematics. A Guide for Par-

ents and Teachers. Penguin Books, 1990. ISBN 0-14-0 13488 -3.

686. P. Liebeck, Scores and forfeits: an intuitive model for in teger arith-

metic. Ed. Stud. Math. 21 no. 3 (1990), 221–239.

687. P. Liljedahl and B. Sriraman, Musings on mathematical creativity,

For the Learning of Math. 26, no. 1 (2006), 20 –23.

688. R. Lins, Characterising the mathematics of the mathematics teacher

from the p oint of view of meaning producti on, International Congress

on Mathematica l Education, Copenhagen, Denmark. July 4–11,

2004.

689. C. A. Maher and A. M. Martino, The development of the idea of math-

ematical proof: A 5-year case study. J. Resea rch in Math emati cs Ed-

ucation 27 no. 2 (1996), 19 4–214 .

690. E. M. Markman, Realizing that you don’t understand: Elementary

school children’s awareness of inconsistencies, Child Development 50

(1979), 643–645.

691. J. Martínez-Torregrosa, R. López-Gay, and A. Gras-Martí, Mathemat-

ics in physics education: scan ning historical evolution of the differen-

tial to ﬁnd a more a p propriate model for teaching differential calcu-

lus in phys ics, Sci. Ed. 15 (2006), 447– 462. DOI 10 .1007/s11191-005-

0258-y.

692. J. Mason and D. Pimm, Generic examples: Seeing the general in the

particular. Ed. Stud. Math. 15 ( 1984), 227 –289.

693. G. McColm, A metaphor for mathematical education, Notices Amer.

Math. Soc. 54, no. 4 (2007), 499–502.

694. H. Mendick, Masculinities in Mathematics. Open University

Press, 2006. ISBN-10: 033521827X. ISBN-13: 978-03352 18271 .

695. J. Monaghan, Young peoples’ ideas of inﬁnity. Ed. Stud. Math. 48, no.

2–3 (2001) , 239–257.

696. M. Montessori, The Mo nte ssori Method (Anne Everett George,

tranls.). Frederick A. Stokes Company, New York, 1912.

697. P. Nesher, Three determinants of d ifﬁculty in verbal arithmetic prob-

lems, Ed. Stud. Math. 7 (1976), 369–388.

698. T. Nunes, D. Desli, and D. Bell, The development of children’s under-

standing of intensive quantities, Internat. J. Ed. Research 39 (2003),

651–675.

699. T. Nunes, P. Bryant, D. Hallett, and D. Evans, Teaching children

about the inverse relati on between addition and subtraction, Math.

Thinking and Learning 1 1, no. 1 & 2 (2009), 61–78.

700. S. A. Papert, Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful

Ideas. Perseus Books, 1993. ISBN-10: 0465046746 . ISBN-13: 978-

0465046744.

SHADOWS OF THE TRUTH VER. 0.813 23-DEC-2010/7:19

 ALEXANDRE V. BOROVIK

260 References

701. N. C. Presmeg, Visualizati on in high school math emati cs, For the

Learning of Ma th. 63 (1986), 4 2–46.

702. N. C. Presmeg, Prototypes, metaphors, metonymies, and imaginative

rationality in high school mathematics, Ed. Stud. Math. 23 (1992),

595–610.

703. R. T. Putnam, L. U. de Bettencourt, and G. Leinhardt, Understanding

of derived-fact strategies in a d dition and subtraction. Cognition and

Instruction 7 (1990), 245–285.

704. H. Radatz, Error analysis i n mathematics education, J. Research

Math. Ed. 10 , no. 3 (1979) , 163–172. Stable URL: http://www.

jstor.org/stable/748804.

705. L. Radford, The seen, the spoken and the written. A s emiotic ap-

proach to the problem of objectiﬁca tion of mathematical knowledge.

For the Learning of Mathematics, 22 no. 2 (2002), 14–2 3.

706. L. Radford, Algebra as tekhne. Artefacts, symbols and equations in

the classroom. Mediterranean J. Research in Math. Edu cation 1 no.

1 (2002), 31–56.

707. L. Radford, Gestures, speech and the sprouting of signs, Mathemati-

cal Thinking and Learning, 5 no. 1 (2003), 37–70.

708. L. Radford, The semiotics of the schema. Kant, P iaget, and the

calculator, in Ac tivity and Sign—Grounding Mathematics Ed-

ucation. Festschrift for Michael Otte (M. H. G. Hoffmann, J.

Lenhard, and F. Seeger, eds.). Springer, 20 05, pp. 137–152.

709. L. Radford, The anthropology of meaning, Ed. Stud. Math. 61 (2006),

39–65.

710. A. Ralston, Research mathematicians and mathematics education: a

critique, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 51, no. 4 (2004), 403–411.

711. S. Restivo and W. K. Bauchspies, The will to mathematics: Min ds,

morals, and numbers. Foundations Sci. 11, nos. 1–2 (2006), 197–215.

ISSN 1233-1821.

712. B. Rittl e Johnson an d M. W. Alibali, Conceptual and procedural

knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? J. Ed. Psych.

91 (1999), 175–189.

713. B. Rittle Johnson, R. S. Siegler, and M. W. Aliba li, Developing concep-

tual understanding and p rocedural skill in mathematics: A n iterative

process. J. Ed. Psych. 93 (2001), 346–362.

714. S. A. Rose and M. Blank, The potency of context in children’s cog-

nition: an illustration through conservation, Child Development 45

(1974), 499–502.

715. D. J. Rosenthal and L. B. Resnick, Children’s solution processes in

arithmetic word problems, J. Ed. Psych. 66 (1974 ) , 817–825.

716. A. H. Schoenfeld, When good teaching leads to bad results: The d is-

aster of well taught mathematics courses, Educational Psychologist

23 no. 2 (1988), 145–166.

717. A. Sfard, On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: reﬂections

on processes and objects a s different sides of the same coin, Ed. Stud.

Math. 22 (1991), 1–36.

718. A. Sfard, Reiﬁcation as the birth of metaphor. For the learning of

Mathematics 14 no. 1 (1994), 44–55.

719. A. Sfard, The gains and the pitfalls of reiﬁcation—The case of

algebra. Ed. Stud. Math. 26, nos. 2–3 (1994), 191–228. DOI:

10.1007/BF01 273663.

SHADOWS OF THE TRUTH VER. 0.813 23-DEC-2010/7:19

 ALEXANDRE V. BOROVIK

References 261

720. A. Sfa rd, The many faces of mathematics: do mathematicians and

researchers in mathematics educa tion speak about the same thing?

Mathematics Education a s a Research Domain: a Search for

Identity, Book 1, 2, 491–511, New ICMI Stud . Ser., 4, Kluwer Acad.

Publ., Dordrecht, 1998, pp. 491–511.

721. A. Sfard, A mathematician’s view of research in mathematics edu-

cation: an interview with Shimshon A. Amitsur. Mathematics Ed-

ucation as a Research Domain: a Search for Identity, Book 1,

2, New ICMI Stud. Ser., 4, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1998, pp.

445–458.

722. A. Sfard, On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of

choosing just one, Ed. Researcher 27, no. 2 (1998), 4–13. DOI:

10.3102/0013189X027002004.

723. A. Sfard, Thinking as Communicating: Human Develop-

ment, the Growth of Discourses, and Mathematizing. Cam-

bridge University Press, 2010. ISBN-10: 0521161541. ISBN-13: 978-

0521161541.

724. S. Shefﬁeld and K. Gallagher, Math and Nonﬁc tion. Grades 3 –5.

Math Solutions Publications, 2 004. ISBN 0-941355-62-4.

725. C. Shen and H. P. Tam, The paradoxical relationship between student

achievement and self-perception: a cross-national analysis b ased on

three waves of TIMSS data. Educational Research and Evaluation,

14 no. 1 (2008), 87–100.

726. R. S. Siegler, Individual differences in strategy choices: good stu -

dents, not-so-good students, and perfectionists, Child Development

59 (1988), 833–851.

727. R. S. Siegler, Hazards of mental chronometry: An example from chil-

dren’s subtraction. J. Ed. Psych. 18 (1989), 497– 506.

728. B. Sriraman, Can mathematical discovery ﬁll the existential void?

The use of conjecture, proof and refutati on in a high school classroom.

Math. in School 32, no. 2 (2003), 2–6.

729. B. Sriraman, Discovering a mathematical principle: The case of M att.

Mathematics in School (UK) 3 no. 2 (2004), 25–31.

730. B. Sriraman, Reﬂective abstraction, uniframes an d the formulation

of generalizations, J. Ma th. Behavior 23, no. 2 (2004), 205–222.

731. B. Srira man, The characteristics of mathematical creativity, ZDM

Math. Ed. 41, nos. 1–2 (2009), 13–27. DOI: 10.1007/s11858-008-0114-

732. L. P. Steffe and P. W. Thompson, Interaction or in tersubjectivity? A

reply to Lerman. J. Research Math. Ed. 31, no. 2 (2000), 191–209.

733. R. M. Steinberg, Instruction of derived facts strategies in addition

and subtraction. J. Research Math. Ed. 16 (1985), 337–358.

734. P. Suppes and F. Binford, Experimental teaching of mathematical

logic in the elementary school, The Arithmetic Teacher 12 (1965),

187–195.

735. D. Tall, The notion of inﬁnite measuring number and its relevance in

the intui tion of inﬁnity, Ed. Stud. Math. 11, no. 3 (1980) , 271–284.

736. D. Tall, Intuitions of inﬁnity, Math. in School 10 (1981), 3 0–33.

737. D. Tall, Inﬁnitesimals constructed algebraically and interpreted geo-

metrically, Mathematical Education for Teaching 4 no. 1 (198 1), 34–

53.

SHADOWS OF THE TRUTH VER. 0.813 23-DEC-2010/7:19

 ALEXANDRE V. BOROVIK

262 References

738. D. Tall, Comments on the dif ﬁculty of and validity of various ap-

proaches to the calculus. For the Learning of Mathematics 2 no. 2

(1981), 16–21.

739. D. Tall, Elementary axioms and pictures for inﬁnitesimal calculus,

Bull. Inst. Math. Appl. 18, nos. 3–4 (1982), 43–48.

740. D. Tal l, Understa nding the processes of advanced mathematical

thinking, Enseign. Math. (2 ) 42, nos. 3–4 (1996), 395–415.

741. D. Tall, Cognitive development i n advanced mathematics usi ng tech-

nology. Math. Ed. Res. J. 12 no. 3 ( 2000), 210–230.

742. D. Tall, Natural and formal inﬁnities, Ed. Stud . Math. 48, no. 2 & 3

(2001), 199–238.

743. D. Tall, A child thinking about inﬁnity, J. Math. Behavior 20, no. 1

(2001), 7–19. DOI: 10.1016/S0732-3123(01)00058-X.

744. D. Tall, A theory of mathematical growth through embodiment, sym-

bolism and proof. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives,

IREM de Strasbourg. 11 (2006), 195–215.

745. D. Tall, How Humans Learn to Think Mathematically. Prince-

ton University Press, 2 010.

746. D. Tall, E. Gray, M. Bin Al i, L. Crowley, P. DeMarois, M. McGowen,

D. Pitta, M. Pi nto, M. Thomas, and Yudariah Yusof, Symbols and the

bifurcation between procedural and conceptual thinking, Canadian

J. Science, Mathematics a nd Technology Education 1 (2001) , 81–104.

747. D. O. Tall, M. O. J. Thomas, G. Davis, E. M. Gray, and A. P. Simp-

son, What i s the object of the encapsulation of a process? J. Math.

Behavior 18, no. 2 (2000), 1 –19.

748. D. Tall and R. L. E . Schwarzenberger, Conﬂicts in the learning of real

numbers and limits, Ma th. Teaching 82 (1978), 4 4–49.

749. D. Tall and S. Vinner, Concept image and concept deﬁnition with par-

ticular references to limits and continui ty, Ed. Stud. Math. 12 (1981),

151–169.

750. I. Thompson (ed.), Teac hing and Lear ning Early Number.

Open University Press, 1997. ISBN-10: 0 33519 8511. ISBN-13: 978-

0335198511.

751. W. P. Thurston, Mathematical education. Notices Amer. Ma th. Soc.

37 (1990), 844–850.

752. P. Tsamir and D. Tirosh, Consistency and representations: The case

of actual inﬁn ity. J. Res. Math. Ed. 30 (1999), 213–219 .

753. B. Van de Rijt, R. Godfrey, C. Aubrey, J. E. H. v. Luit, P. Ghesquiere,

J. Torbeyns, et al. The development of early numeracy in Europe. J.

Early Childh ood Research 1 no. 2 (2003), 155–180.

754. J. Vincent and B. M cCrae, Mechanical linkages, d ynamic geometry

software and mathematical proof. Australian Senior Mathematics

Journal 15 no. 1 (2001), 56–63.

755. J. Vlassis, Making sense of the minus sign or becoming ﬂexible in

‘negativity’, Learning and Instru ction 14 (2004), 469–484.

756. K. Weller, A. Brown, E. Dubi nsky, M. McDonald, and C. Stenger, In-

timations of inﬁni ty. Notices Amer. M ath. Soc. 51, no. 7 (2004), 741–

750.

757. H.-H. Wu, The role of open-ended problems in mathematics educa-

tion, J. Math. Behavior 13 (1994), 115–12 8.

SHADOWS OF THE TRUTH VER. 0.813 23-DEC-2010/7:19

 ALEXANDRE V. BOROVIK

References 263

758. H.-H. Wu, Review of three books b y Gelfand et al. Math. Intelligencer

17 (1995), 68–75.

759. H.-H. Wu, The mathematician and the mathematics education re-

form, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 43 (1996), 15 31–1537.

760. H.-H. Wu, The role of Euclidean geometry in high school, J. Math.

Behavior 15 (1996), 221–237.

761. H.-H. Wu, T he Mathematics Education Reform: Why you should be

concerned and what you can do, Amer. Math . Monthl y 1 0, no. 4

(1997), 946–954.

762. H.-H. Wu, Basic skills versus conceptual understa nding: A b ogus di-

chotomy in mathematics education, Amer. Educator 23, n o. 3 (199 9),

14–19, 50–52. http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_

educator/fall99/index.html.

763. H.-H. Wu, What’s sophisticated about elementary math-

ematics? A mer. Educator 3 3, no. 3 (2009), 4–14. http:

//www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/issues/

fall2009/wu.pdf.

764. R. Zazki s and S. R. Campbell, Prime decomposition: Understanding

uniqueness. J. Math. Behavior 15 (2) ( 1996), 207–218.

765. R. Zazkis and E. J. Chernoff, What makes a counterexample exem-

plary? Educ. Stud. Math. 68 (2008), 195–20 8. DOI 10.1007/s10649-

007-9110-4.

766. R. Zazkis and P. Liljedahl, Understanding primes: The role of repre-

sentation. J. Res. in Math. Ed. 35 no. 3 (2004) , 164–186.

767. A. Zvonkin, Mathematics for little ones, J. Math. Behavior 11, no. 2

(1992), 207–219.

768. A. Zvonkin, Children and





, J. Math. Behavior 12, no. 2 (1993), 141–

152.

“Mathematicaly Gifted” Children

769. T. Andreescu, J. A. Gallian, J. M. Kane, and J. E. Mertz, Cross-

cultural a nalysis of students with exceptional talent in ma thematical

problem solving, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 55, no. 10 (2008), 1249–

1260.

770. C. P. Benbow, Sex di fferences in mathemati cal reasoni ng ability

among the intellectually talented: Their characterization, conse-

quences, and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain Sci. 11 (1988),

169–232.

771. C. P. Benbow, Aca demic achievement in mathematics and science of

students b etween ages 13 and 23: Are there differences among stu-

dents in the top one percent of mathematical ability? J. Ed. Psych. 84

(1992), 51–61.

772. C. P. Benbow and O. Arjmand, Predictors of high academic achieve-

ment in mathematics and science by mathematically talented stu-

dents: A longitu dinal study. J. Ed. Ps ych. 82, no. 3 (1990), 4 30–441.

773. C. P. Benbow and R. M. Benb ow, Biological correlates of high mathe-

matical reasoning ability, Progress in Brain R es ea rch 61 (1984), 469–

490.

774. L. L. Chang, Who are the mathematically gifted elementary school

children? Roeper Review 8 (1985), 76–79.

SHADOWS OF THE TRUTH VER. 0.813 23-DEC-2010/7:19

 ALEXANDRE V. BOROVIK

264 References

775. M. A. Clements, Terence Ta o, Ed. Stud. Math. 15 (1 984), 213– 238.

776. S. Damarin , The mathematically able as a marked category, Gender

and Ed. 12, no. 1 (2000), 69–85.

777. V. J. Dark and C. P. Benbow, Enhanced probl em translati on and

short-term memory: C omponents of mathematical talent. J. Ed.

Psych. 82, no. 3 (1990), 420–429.

778. C. M. Diezmann, Capi talising on the zeitgeist for mathematically

gifted students, Australasian J. Gifted Ed. 11, no. 2 (2002), 5–10.

779. C. M. Di ezman n and J. J. Watters, Two faces of mathematical gi f ted-

ness, Teaching Math. 21, no. 2 (1996), 22–25.

780. C. M. Diezmann and J. J. Watters, Catering for mathematically gifted

elementary students : Lea rning from challenging tasks, Gifted Child

Today 23, no. 4 (20 00), 14–19, 52.

781. C. Diezmann and J. Watters, The collaborati on of mathematically

gifted students on challenging tasks, J. Ed . Gifted 25, no. 1 (2001),

7–31.

782. C. Diezmann and J. Watters, The i mportance of challenging tasks f or

mathematically gifted students, Gifted and Talented International

17, no. 2 (2003), 76– 84.

783. N. F. Ellerton, Children’s made-up mathematics problems—a new

perspective on talented mathematicians, Ed. Stud. Math. 17 (1 986),

261–271.

784. G. H. Gear, Accuracy of teacher judgement in identifying intellectu-

ally gifted children: A review of the literature, Gifted Child Quart.

20, no. 4 (1976), 478 –489.

785. E. L. Grigorenko, L. Jarvin, Mei Tan, and R. J. Sternberg, Something

new in the garden: Assessing creativity in academic domain s (2008) .

Scientiﬁc Commons, http://www.psychologie-aktuell.

com/fileadmin/download/PschologyScience/2-2008/14_

Grigorenko.pdf.

786. C. Greenes, Identifying the gifted student in math emati cs, Arith-

metic Teacher, 28 no. 6 (1981), 14–17.

787. N. Hall, Teaching primary school students talented in mathematics,

Australasian J. Gifted Ed. 6, no. 1 (1997), 21–26 .

788. M. K. Heid, Characteristics and special needs of the gifted student in

mathematics, Math. Teacher 76 (1983), 221–226.

789. B. Hermelin and N. O’Connor, Spatial representations in mathemat-

ically and in artis tically gifted children, British J. Ed. Psych. 56, no.

2 (1986), 150–157.

790. E. Hong and Y. Aqui, Cognitive and motivational characteristi cs

of adolescents gifted in mathematics: Comparis ons among students

with different types of giftedness, Gifted Child Quart. 48, no. 3 (2004),

191–201.

791. M. L. Johnson, Identifying and teaching mathematically gifted ele-

mentary school children, Arithmetic Teacher 30, no. 5 (1983), 25–26,

55–56.

792. D. P. Keating, The study of mathematically precocious youth, J. Spe-

cial Ed . 9, no. 1 (1975), 45 –62.

793. D. P. Keating and J. C. Stanley, Extreme measures for the exception-

ally gifted in mathematics and science, Ed . Researcher 1, no. 9 (1972),

3–7. DOI: 10.3 102/0013189X001009003.

SHADOWS OF THE TRUTH VER. 0.813 23-DEC-2010/7:19

 ALEXANDRE V. BOROVIK