earth alkali cations. Di Leo (2000) compared the intercalation of glycine into Ca
2+
and Cd
2+
montmorillonite. The exchange reaction was dominant for Ca
2+
mont-
morillonite. Once glycine molecules in the zwitter ionic form penetrated the inter-
layer space, the molecules were full y protonated due to the enhanced acidity of
interlayer water molecules. Complexation was preferred by Cd
2+
ions. The inter-
esting observation that Cd
2+
ions on the external surface were not complexed was
related to the formation of inner-surface complexes between these Cd
2+
ions and the
surface oxygen atoms. Asparatic acid in the anionic form (isoelectric point at
pH ¼ 3) was weakly bound in the interlayer space of montmorillonite and easily
extractable with KCl solutions (Naidja and Huang, 1994). The authors assumed the
carboxylate groups were coordinated to the interlayer calcium ions by water bridges.
The intercalation of several amino acids (cysteine, lysine, and proline) can be ac-
companied by polycondensation (Siffert and Kessaissia, 1978).
When vermiculite was reacted with g-amino butyri c acid, o-amino caproic acid,
or ornithine (Rausell-Colom and Forne
´
s, 1974; Raupach et al., 1975; Raupach and
Janik, 1976), the vermiculite particles delaminated in water and formed hydrogels
(see Chapter 5). The exchange of the inorganic inter layer cations by 11-carboxy
undecylammonium ions (the protonated form of o-amino undecanoic acid) allowed
the intercalation and polymerisation of e-caprolactam (see Chapter 10.3).
The study of amino acid–clay mineral interactions was promoted by the possi-
bility that a clay mineral may discriminate between optical isomers of amino acids.
This possibility attracted much interest as well as controversy (see Hashizume et al.,
2002). Kaolinite with other than triclinic stacking of the layers exhibits two inverse
forms, and a stereoselective adsorption of optically active molecules may be under-
standable. The reports in the literature are contradictory (Siffert and Naidja, 1992).
In contrast, montmorillonite particles do not exhibit ‘‘structural asymmetry’’. How-
ever, structural chirality may be induced by the different packing modes of adsorbed
enantiomers or
DL pairs as proposed by Yamagishi (see Section 7.3.5). In fact, Siffert
and Naidja (1992), studying the adsorption and deamination of glutaminic and
aspartic acid, found a certain preference for the
L forms and a higher degree of
deamination of these enantiomers. More recently, Hashizume et al. (2002) reported a
preference of certain allophanes for the
L form of alanyl alanine, but no clear pref-
erence was developed for
D-orL-alanine.
The adsorption of organic molecules with more highly complicated structures
depends on the type of the clay mineral, the degree of purification (see Chapter 4),
the interlayer cation, the mean layer charge, concentration (or vapour pressure) of
the adsorptive, pH value, and temperature, but also on the fine structure of the clay
mineral (type and degree of substitutions, especially Al
3+
/Si
4+
, layer charge distri-
bution), particle size, degree of dispersion, ionic strength (Nari ne and Guy, 1981),
type of salts present, and possible association equilibria in the solution. The ad-
sorption of nuclein bases (adenine, cytosine, thymine, and uracil) on montmorillo-
nite not only depended on the salts present and the mean layer charge but also on the
charge distribution (Lagaly, 1984; Samii and Lagaly, 1987). Exchange of the sodium
Chapter 7.3: Clay Mineral Organic Interactions326