Early acid-dissolution studi es of dioctahedral smectites in HCl by Osthaus (1954,
1956), based on solution analysis, indicated faster dissolution of octahedral than
tetrahedral sheets. Assays of solid reaction products employing advanced spec-
troscopic techniques provided experimental evidence that acid treatments dissolve
central atoms from the tetrahedral and octahedral sheets at similar rates (Luca and
MacLachlan, 1992; Tka
´
c
ˇ
et al., 1994).
Luca and MacLachlan (1992) studied the dissolution in 10% HCl of two non-
tronites from Garfield and Hohen–Hagen, by Mo
¨
ssbauer spectroscopy. They fit the
spectra either with two octahedral Fe
3+
doublets or with two octahedral and one
tetrahedral Fe
3+
doublet. Isomer shift and quadrupole splitting values obtained
from the two-doublet models correspond to octahedral Fe
3+
and not to tetrahedral
Fe
3+
as Osthaus (1954) has suggested. W hen a tetrahedral Fe
3+
doublet is included
in the model used to fit the Mo
¨
ssbauer spectra of acid-treated Garfield nontronite
samples, a slight increase in the intensity of that doublet occurs with increasing
dissolution. This is much lower than Osthaus (1954) indicated. No trend in the
intensity of the tetrahedral Fe
3+
doublet is observed for acid-treated Hohen-Hagen
nontronite samples. Therefore, acid treatment appears to remove octahedral and
tetrahedral Fe
3+
from the nontronite structure at about the same rate. Mo
¨
ssbauer
and IR spectroscopies, and XRD indicate that the undissolved part of nontronite
remaining after acid treatment is structurally similar to the untreated nontronite.
27
Al and
29
Si MAS NMR spectroscopic studies on removal of tetrahedral and oc-
tahedral Al
3+
from montmorillonite by 6 M HCl, yield very similar conclusions
(Tka
´
c
ˇ
et al., 1994). The rates of dissolution of tetrahedral and octahedral Al
3+
are
also comparable for montmorillonite. Three different types of structural units have
been identified in acid-treated samples, including (SiO)
3
SiOH units, remaining as a
result of poor-ordering of the framework without the possibility of cross-linking.
The extent of the dissolution reaction depends on both clay mineral type and
reaction conditions, such as the acid/ clay ratio, acid concentration, time and tem-
perature of the reaction. The composition of the clay layers substantially affects their
stability against acid attack; trioctahedral layers dissolve much faster than their
dioctahedral counterparts (Vicente et al., 1994, 1995b; Breen et al., 1995a; Komadel
et al., 1996b). Higher substitutions of M g
2+
and/or Fe
3+
for Al
3+
in dioctahedral
smectites increase their dissolution rate in acids (Breen et al., 1995b). For 15 di-
octahedral smectites, there is a good correlation of the Mg
2+
and Fe
3+
contents with
the half time of dissolution in 6 M HCl at 96 1C(Nova
´
k and C
ˇ
ic
ˇ
el, 1978). Effects of
smectite type, acid concentration and temperature on the ha lf time of dissolution in
0.2 L HCl/g smectite acid/clay ratio in closed systems (no substances being add ed or
removed) are summarized in Table 7.1.1.
The rate of dissolution of various atoms, obtained from chemical analysis of the
liquid reaction products, indicates the presence of different phases in bentonite.
Readily soluble octahedral and tetrahedral constituents, and ‘‘insoluble’’ portions of
constituent atoms can be calculated from the dissolution curves. This provides in-
formation on the distribution of atoms in the sample (C
ˇ
ı
´
c
ˇ
el and Komadel, 1994).
Chapter 7.1: Acid Activation of Clay Minerals268