904 C. C. Tsuei and J.R. Kirtley
other hands, the observed universal d-wave pair-
ing in cuprate superconductors is not unexpected,
because the basic theoretical models for describ-
ing high-temperature superconductivity,such as the
one-band Hubbard model and its large-U limit, the
t-J model, are all intrinsically electron-hole sym-
metrical [231]. Electron-hole asymmetry can be in-
corporated into various t − t
− J models [232,233]
and three-band Hubbard models [234]. For example,
the differences in doping characteristics between the
electron- and hole-doped cuprates can be explained
in terms of band structureeffects based on a t −t
−J
model [233] or a three-band Hubbard model [235].
However, this feat and more can be accomplished
by taking into account the different dispersions for
the two types of charge carriers, and by using an ef-
fective one-band Hubbard model [236]. Therefore, it
appears that the apparent electron-hole asymmetry,
as manifested in many anomalous properties, stems
largely fromband structure effectsand is not relevant
in determining pairing symmetry. This finding and
the small in-plane coherence length (∼20Å) charac-
teristic to all cuprate superconductors, suggests that
the universal d-wave pairing occurs on a relatively
local scale.
16.5.2 Extended s-Wave Pair State
As mentioned in Sect. 16.2, there has been an enor-
mous amount of work on tests of the pairing sym-
metry in the cuprate superconductors using various
phase insensitive techniques [4, 5, 7]. Although this
work has resulted in a general consensus that the
pairing wavefunction has lines of nodes, these tech-
niques, with the exception of angle resolved pho-
toemission, are relatively insensitive to the momen-
tum dependence of the nodal structure. This makes
it difficult for them to distinguish, for example, be-
tween d
x
2
−y
2
symmetry (with four lines of nodes),
and extended s-wave symmetry (with eight lines of
nodes). There has recently been support for the lat-
ter symmetry from analysis of various phase insen-
sitive tests of pairing symmetry [237,238]. These au-
thors attempt to reconcile this conclusion with the
phase-sensitive experiments, which definitively fa-
vor d
x
y
−y
2
symmetry,by arguing that the cuprates can
have different bulk and surface symmetries [192].In
this view the phase-insensitive techniques probe the
bulk extended s-wave symmetry, while the phase-
sensitive techniques,which depend on surface sensi-
tive Josephson tunneling,probed-wavepairing sym-
metry.
This view seems untenable for several reasons.
First, the consistency of the tricrystal experiments
[7], both in that samples with a -ring geometry for
a d-wave superconductor always show the half-flux
quantum effect,andthat the half-fluxquantumeffect
can be turned on and off by changing the tricrystal
geometry in a way that is consistent with d
x
2
−y
2
pair-
ingsymmetry,makeitappear extremelyunlikelythat
these experiments are controlled by surface effects.
Second, the tricrystal experiments have shown that
the half-flux quantum effect persists,with no change
in the total flux within experimental accuracy, to
withina degree of T
c
[239].At these temperatures the
ab plane coherence length can be ten times the unit
cell dimension, meaning that these experiments are
not surface sensitive but rather probe the order pa-
rameter deeply into the bulk: nevertheless the results
strongly favor d-wave pairing symmetry.Further,al-
though the I
c
R
n
product forthegrainboundary junc-
tions used in the tricrystal experiments are relatively
small, experiments with -SQUIDs and facetted -
junctions in YBCO-Nb ramp junctions produce con-
vincing evidence for d-wave symmetry with junc-
tion I
c
R
n
products within a factor of four of the
Ambegaokar–Baratoff limit [174–176]. This means
that the superconducting gap is not significantly re-
duced by surface effects in these samples.
The tetracrystal experiments [130] have provided
strong evidence for pure d-wave pairing symmetry
in tetragonal Tl-2201. It also rules out anisotropic s-
wave pairing symmetry.The tetragonal crystal struc-
ture of the Tl-2201 epitaxial films used in this ex-
periment were checked and confirmed with three
techniques for microstructural analysis [130]. It is
well established that Tl-2201 can be fabricated with
either orthorhombic or tetragonal crystal structure
with identical superconducting properties (includ-
ing T
c
∼80 K) [240–242]. Furthermore, it has been
shown that there is no temperature-dependent struc-
tural phase transition in the temperature range