This list is intended as a sample specification that can be used as a model for definition of test washers in
general. For simulation of production, component sections of actual parts can be made into washer coupons.
Fixtures can often be fabricated to permit mounting unmodified components on the research head for efficient
testing of as-manufactured surfaces.
Thread Tolerance for and Surface Finish of Reference Components. The surface finish and thread tolerance for
reference components should comply with the following specifications appropriate to the parts to be evaluated.
For example, DIN 946 suggests the following specifications for bolts and nuts used to evaluate lubricants and
coatings:
• Where bolts are to be tested, nuts with a bright finish should be used as reference components,
degreased and capable of being fully loaded with thread manufactured to a tolerance of 6 H. If the bolt
cannot be easily screwed in by hand, nuts with thread manufactured to a larger tolerance should be used.
• Where nuts are to be tested, zinc-phosphated bolts should be used as reference components, degreased
and with thread manufactured to a tolerance of 6 g. The coated bolt should permit the nut to be easily
mounted by hand.
• When investigating the effects of lubricants, bolts and nuts that comply with the requirements specified
under the preceding two items should be used.
In general, it is necessary that finishes and tolerances of test components be adequately defined to permit
replication of test conditions.
Tightening Rate Specification (rpm). In order to standardize testing conditions, it is necessary to closely control
tightening speed (rpm). Maintenance of a constant turning rate is essential to obtaining comparable results. The
recommended tightening rate of the assembly is 30 rpm as specified by DIN 946. Certain locknut testing
standards require 100 rpm. In general, larger fasteners must be run at slower speeds to achieve uniform,
predictable results. Depending on the surface coatings, lubricants, and size of fasteners, testing speeds as low as
5 to 10 rpm may be necessary to ensure repeatable results. Because production tools are often selected
improperly, based upon high speed capability, extreme caution must be taken to verify tension obtained on
actual assemblies.
Evaluation
The coefficients of friction are determined from Eq 9, 10, 11, and 12, making allowance for the geometry of
bolt, nut, and washer for the torque applied and the proofing load generated.
Using Eq 9, 10, 11, and 12, the following parameters are entered: nominal sizes of d
2
, P, and d
h
, and the size of
d
w
in accordance with the relevant product standard.
Evaluation of the test results may best be made by reading the coefficients of friction from the diagrams plotted
on the basis of Eq 7 and 8. Normally, the minimum value of d
w
as specified in the relevant product standard is
to be entered in these equations. The maximum hole size or chamfer diameter is used for d
h
.
The test results should be plotted, where possible, in a single graph for ease of comparison. Where bolt and nut
assemblies are to be subjected to repeated tightening and loosening cycles, the results for each assembly may be
plotted separately to minimize confusion. Evaluation should be based on a proofing load obtained for an
average value of μ
G
, μ
K
, or μ
ges
as determined by testing as specified in VDI 2230, Part 1.
By way of simplification, for normal values of μ, from 0.10 to 0.16, evaluation may be based on a value of F
V
equal to 0.7 · F
0.2
(nominally, 70% of yield load).
Outliers are ignored only if they can be definitely assigned to abnormal influences, such as a chip caught in a
thread and so on. As a rule, the evaluation should be based on 12 tests. A different number of tests may be
agreed upon between the concerned parties.
Test Report
It is recommended that test results reported include maximum, mean, and minimum values and the standard
deviation based upon n-1 sample calculation, assuming a normal distribution. In the test report, the coefficients
of friction, normally minimum and maximum values, should be given together with details of the test
conditions as itemized in the section “Procedure,” stating any deviations from these conditions. The test report