Page 484
merging of the EC and the EU (but not Euratom) into one organisation, the Union, with only
one governing treaty, the Constitution, yet retaining special procedures for foreign policy,
security and defence;
conferring legal personality on the Union alone;
integrating the Charter of Fundamental Rights into the Constitution;
clarifying how the competences are distributed; the Union would have exclusive competence
for monetary policy for the euro member states, common commercial policy, the customs
union and the common fisheries policy; and the Union would share competence with member
states on, for example, the internal market, security and justice, agriculture, transport, energy,
social policy, the environment and public health;
simplifying the legal instruments and procedures available to the institutions;
clarifying the respective roles of the Council, the Parliament and the Commission;
extending the co-decision procedure so that some 95 per cent of Union legislation would be
adopted jointly by the Council and the Parliament;
creating a Union Minister of Foreign Affairs (although a Commissioner, he would operate
according to a mandate determined by the Council and would be able to conclude treaties
between the Union and third states);
distinguishing the European Council more clearly from the Council of Ministers, and
appointing a President of the European Council for a two-and-a-half-year term with limited
powers;
limiting the Parliament to a maximum of 750 seats, with a minimum of six, and a maximum of
ninety-nine, seats per member;
keeping one Commissioner per member state until 2014, after which the number would
correspond to two-thirds of the member states, the Commissioners being chosen according to a
system based on equal rotation among the member states;
changing the qualified majority. Adoption of a proposal would require the support of at least
55 per cent of the member states (fourteen out of twenty-five) representing at least 65 per cent
of the population of the Union. For a minority to prevent adoption of a decision, it would
therefore have to include at least four large member states, so making it that much more
difficult for such member states to block adoption. Also, Council members representing at least
three-quarters of a blocking minority, whether at the level of member states or population,
could require a vote to be postponed so that discussions can continue for a reasonable time in
an attempt to reach a broader basis for consensus.