112
of 1789 (1970), or in Coluche’s one-man com-
edy shows, with the distinctive comic persona
of the ‘ordinary bloke’ (le mec).
Often the portrayal of class has been asso-
ciated with the Left, as in the poems and film
scripts of Jacques Prévert, the paintings of
Fernand Léger or the novels of Louis Aragon.
It was a feature of the ‘socialist realist’ move-
ment of the late 1940s and early 1950s, pro-
moted by the Communist Party and exempli-
fied in the novels of André Stil, or the paint-
ings of André Fougeron, whose subjects were
the struggles of dockers, miners and other in-
dustrial workers. But class has also been a fo-
cus of the more conservative ‘heritage’ culture,
exemplified in Berri’s films Jean de Florette and
Manon des sources (1986), which examine the
hierarchies of rural society and the onset of
modernization. Whatever their ideological
preferences or personal aspirations, French au-
diences remain fascinated by images and nar-
ratives of class.
The providers of culture have, however,
sought not only to satisfy their audiences, but
also to widen them, attempting to draw in the
‘popular’ or working classes, which since the
1950s have had significant amounts of dispos-
able income. In the process, they have also
been led to reappraise and widen the notion
of what might legitimately count as culture.
In practice, if not in theory, these two con-
cerns have usually been in conflict, the aims
of ‘democratizing culture’ cutting across those
of ‘cultural democracy’. And, since 1945, both
tendencies have had weighty advocates.
Both the Fourth and Fifth Republics pur-
sued policies of state support for the arts, en-
couraging more popular access to the estab-
lished founts of culture: to libraries, museums
and galleries, theatres, and even, with the
Cinémathèque, to cinemas. Then early at-
tempts at decentralization were followed by
Malraux’s maisons de la culture of the 1960s,
attempting to expand the number of these cen-
tres of cultural excellence. This process was
accelerated through the huge expansion of the
Ministry of Culture in the Mitterrand presi-
dencies, under the impulsion of Jack Lang.
However, in most of these attempts to bring
culture to the people, the benefits were largely
reaped by the well-to-do middle classes.
The opposite approach, of valorizing the
culture of the people, was largely aimed at giv-
ing recognition to existing cultural activities
of the industrial and rural working classes,
and enabling them to develop their critical and
creative abilities. Its most articulate early ad-
vocates were the People and Culture (Peuple
et culture) association, formed of left-wing
Catholics and communist activists. From 1945
onwards they arranged cultural events in
workplaces, church halls and community cen-
tres, and organized film clubs, festivals and
other local initiatives. Gradually their work
was taken up by adult education networks and
from the 1960s by the new category of ‘cul-
tural animators’ (animateurs), first at munici-
pal level, and then under Jack Lang by the
Ministry of Culture. The state imprimatur on
a wider concept of culture, including, for ex-
ample, folk crafts, popular music, and comic
strips (bandes dessinées), has typically met
with a mixed response, being widely resented
for co-opting and institutionalizing activities
which had their origins in resistance to the
dominant bourgeois cultural values.
Since 1945, French intellectuals have devel-
oped many approaches to class, ranging from
Marxist theories of class struggle as the motor
of history, through debates on whether economic
changes were transforming or entrenching the
class structures, to the subordination or aban-
donment of class in favour of other social preoc-
cupations such as race, gender, sexuality or ecol-
ogy. Class has usually been euphemized in gov-
ernmental discourse, even under Socialist gov-
ernments, but class issues continue to be reflected
in social problems of unemployment, homeless-
ness, urban decay and the like, and the figures
of proletariat and ‘lumpenproletariat’
(underclass) lurk under the preferred notions of
inequality (les inégalités), insecurity (la précarité)
and exclusion.
MICHAEL KELLY
See also: Catholicism and Protestantism; con-
stitution of the Fifth Republic; literary adap-
tations; Marxism and Marxian thought
class