data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cd71/1cd71be95d9ef053750a59225e2e61fc85c392a9" alt=""
Chapter 4: Group financial statements
© EWP Go to www.emilewoolfpublishing.com for Q/As, Notes & Study Guides 119
Significant influence is defined as the power to participate in the financial and
operating policy decisions of the entity, but is not control or joint control.
IAS 28 states that if an entity holds 20% or more of the voting power (equity) of
another entity, it is presumed that significant influence exists, and the
investment should be treated as an associate.
If an entity owns less than 20% of the equity of another entity, the normal
presumption is that significant influence does not exist.
Holding 20% to 50% of the equity of another entity therefore means as a general rule
that significant influence exists, but not control; therefore the investment is treated
as an associate, provided that it is not a joint venture.
The ‘20% or more’ rule is a general guideline, however, and IAS 28 states more
specifically how significant influence arises. The existence of significant influence is
usually evidenced in one or more of the following ways:
representation on the board of directors
participation in policy-making processes, including participation in decisions
about distributions (dividends)
material transactions between the two entities
an interchange of management personnel between the two entities
the provision of essential technical information by one entity to the other.
An entity loses significant influence when it loses the ability to participate in
financial and operating policy decisions of the entity in which it has invested (the
‘investee ‘ entity). This might occur, for example, if the investee becomes subject to
the control of a government, a court or a regulator. Alternatively, influence might be
lost if an entity holds 25% of the equity in another company but the other 75% of the
equity is acquired by a single purchaser who therefore gains control.
Definition of a joint venture
A joint venture is defined by IAS 31 as: ‘a contractual arrangement whereby two or
more parties undertake an economic activity that is subject to joint control.’
Joint control is defined as ‘the contractually agreed sharing of control over an
economic entity.’ Joint control only exists when the strategic financial and operating
decisions relating to the economic activity require the unanimous consent of the
entities sharing control (the joint venturers).
Joint control is the key factor in deciding whether a joint venture exists. The
following characteristics are common to all types of joint venture:
two or more joint venturers are bound by a contractual arrangement (usually in
writing); and
the contractual arrangement establishes joint control.