The solution in terms of the hierarchical basis is expanded as follows:
U(ξ, η) =
2
X
i=1
2
X
j=1
c
1
ij
N
1
ij
+
p
X
k=2
"
2
X
j=1
c
k
3j
N
k
3j
+
2
X
i=1
c
k
i3
N
k
i3
#
+
p
X
k=4
X
λ+µ=k−4
c
kλµ
33
N
kλµ
33
.
The total number of the functions in this representation can be calculated as
4 + 4(p − 1)
+
+
(p − 2)
+
(p − 3)
+
2
, where q
+
= max(q, 0).
It is interesting to compare the total number of the function for three
basises of the order p: the direct product basis and the hierarchical basis in
the canonical square, and the minimally admissible set which coincides with
the basis in the canonical triangle. These number are presented in the table:
degree p 1 2 3 4
the triangle basis 3 6 10 15
the direct product basis 4 9 16 25
the hierarchical basis 4 8 12 17
One can see that both basises for the square are not optimal with respect to
the number of functions. For the low polynomial degrees p = 1, 2, they are
very similar, and the number of the functions essentially exceeds that for the
triangle. For higher p, however, quality of the hierarchical basis improves
and the number of the functions asymptotically converges to the optimal
value. Quality of the direct product basis stays the same, the number of the
functions essentially exceeds the optimal value.
17 The three-dimensional elements
17.1 The tetrahedron
For the three-dimensional case, the number of polynomials of the degree p is
equal to
n
p
=
(p + 1)(p + 2)(p + 3)
6
.
64