816 High-Speed Engines
l Maintain, and if possible reduce, the specific fuel consumption.
l Reduce the weight/power ratio and enhance engine compactness.
l Reduce installation costs.
l Retain the maximum number of existing components.
Power can be raised in two ways: by increasing the brake mean effec-
tive pressure and by increasing the piston speed. Increasing piston speed can
be effected by increasing the revolutions per minute and by lengthening the
stroke. Increasing the revolutions per minute was not attractive because of a
need to maintain an acceptable synchronized speed for land power plant appli-
cations but also because of these drawbacks: increased specific fuel consump-
tion; higher wear rate; and higher noise levels.
Raising piston speed by lengthening the stroke is considered preferable
because it reduces specific fuel consumption and fosters optimum performance
at starting and low load (the compression ratio is secured without resorting to a
combustion chamber that is too flat). This route was therefore selected but with
the piston speed limited to 11.5 m/s (representing an increase of 14 per cent
with a stroke of 330 mm). To reach the required power rating, the brake mean
effective pressure had to be increased by 10 per cent; this was achieved by
adopting high-performance turbochargers. Attaining the desired specific fuel
consumption called for the maximum cylinder pressure to be raised to 160 bar.
Coping with these new parameters dictated redesigning some key compo-
nents. The existing cylinder head, for example, was incompatible with the tar-
geted specific fuel consumption level. This was partly because its mechanical
strength was insufficient in relation to the necessary peak combustion pressure,
and partly because the pressure loss through the inlet and exhaust ports would
be unacceptable in relation to the intervening gas flow dictated by the increased
power. A new cylinder head was therefore designed with a reinforced bore-
cooled fire plate and incorporating inlet and exhaust ports with large dimen-
sions. In addition, cooled seats were specified for the inlet valves as well as the
exhaust valves to maximize seat reliability and avoid risks of burning.
A redesigned connecting rod was also necessary to address the increased
peak compression pressures and the inertia efforts linked to the lengthening of
the stroke. The bevel-cut design of the original component was abandoned in
favour of a straight-cut rod to avoid weak points, such as the bevel-cut serra-
tions and the threading anchorage in the shank. Piston cooling by jet replaced
the traditional oil supply through the connecting rod from the crankpin, simpli-
fying machining and allowing the bearing shell grooves to be eliminated and
yield these benefits: increasing capacity of the bearing shells; stopping cam
wear of the crankpin (differential wearing of the pins between the side areas
of the plain bearing shell and the central area; that is, the area including the
groove); and cutting out the risk of cavitation erosion on the bearing shells at
the end of the grooves. The new connecting rod is 10 per cent lighter than its
bevel-cut forerunner. The weight reduction, along with an improved bearing
shell capacity, partly compensates for the increased inertia efforts.