282 Vehicle noise and vibration refi nement
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2010
The principle of an active control device is to produce a force or pressure
out of phase with that from the powertrain to provide phase cancellation.
Where the excitation is a structure-borne vibration, such as engine noise
through the mounts, it makes sense to use a method of AVC. However,
AVC may never become viable in the automotive market because the cost
and mass of actuators to generate an opposing force can be high. One varia-
tion is to use a resonant spring–mass system to provide a high force output.
For example, this method has been used inside engine mounts to generate
a high opposing force, but has the limitation of providing a suffi cient output
only over a narrow frequency range (Lee and Rahbar 2005). The existing
technology of switchable damping in hydraulic mounts will probably take
the position as the preferred method of isolating the engine from the body.
ANC has its problems as well. Due to the spatial dependence of noise in
the cabin, often an array of microphones and speakers are required to
effectively provide noise cancellation at all seating locations. Thus the
higher the frequency of noise to be cancelled, the higher the cost of elec-
tronic hardware and the complexity of the software. One proposal to over-
come this problem is to cancel the noise at its source, for example by placing
the feedback speaker inside the exhaust system (Garabedian and Zintel
2001) or induction system (Vaishya 2005).
12.5.2 Fuel economy challenges
Ultimately the greatest challenge in the future will be maintaining good
noise and vibration refi nement while meeting ever-tightening fuel economy
requirements of the vehicle. The challenges driven by fuel economy can be
categorised as a ‘triple-whammy’ for noise and vibration engineers:
• Greater source excitation from internal combustion engines
• Vehicle mass reductions
• Engineering budget biased towards fuel economy improvements.
New and higher vibration sources can be expected in the evolution of the
internal combustion engine and driveline. Already we are seeing early
lockup of the torque converter on automatic transmissions (Hage and
Szatkowski 2007). Even if electronic slip control is used to maintain tor-
sional isolation from the engine, the result is engine speeds at highway
cruise extending down to lower speeds than before. Designing for cruising
refi nement means that all vibration modes in the extended cruise window
of operation must be controlled.
New engines will also bring higher loads and forces to contend with.
Diesel engines, although not exactly new, provide a good example. Higher
torque levels from diesel engines generate larger torque pulses that result
in many driveline vibration challenges. Diesel engines also present a
problem of high-frequency airborne noise levels from their high-pressure
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://woodhead.metapress.com
ETH Zuerich (307-97-768)
Sunday, August 28, 2011 12:07:49 AM
IP Address: 129.132.208.2