174
1988; Wu et al
.,
1989; Agathos et al
.,
1990; Caron
et al., 1990; Shuler et al
.,
1990). A critical reading
of such reports shows that the factors in need of opti-
mization with direct implications for bioreactor design
and operation are multiple and include: cell density,
cell viability, growth stage, multiplicity of infection
(MOI), time post infection for harvesting, cell nutri-
tion (media ingredients, serum or substitutes) and tim-
ing of feeding, dissolved oxygen concentration (DO),
temperature, pH and osmotic pressure of media. A
concrete definition and understanding of the qualita-
tive and quantitative influences of these parameters,
one by one, on virus or protein productivity by the
insect cell – BEV system can lead to optimized cul-
tivation and infection protocols that eventually could
be more widely applicable and less system- (e.g. cell
line-) specific. Some specific examples of studies on
selected parameters (oxygen, MOI, temperature, pH
and osmolality) in the context of insect cell bioreactor
cultivation are given in the next section.
For insect cell cultivation two central sets of consid-
erations underlie bioreactor design and scale-up. First,
the need to satisfy the aerobic respiration requirements
of the proliferating and infected cell population under
the physicochemical, mechanical and geometric con-
straints imposed on the devices used for homogeneous
mixing and oxygen supply to the culture, while at the
same time safeguarding the cells’ integrity from hydro-
dynamic shear forces. Second, the quest for maxi-
mal volumetric productivity in virus or protein product
(amount per unit volume of bioreactor), which may
be achieved through increased specific gene expres-
sion capacity (or viral particle formation rate) per cell
and/or increased useful cell density per unit reactor
volume over the course of the process.
The satisfaction of the insect cells’ oxygen demand
upon bioreactor culture and scaleup requires an under-
standing of the hydrodynamic forces exerted upon the
cells in the cource of agitation and sparging. Extensive
work on this topic is summarized in excellent recent
reviews (Papoutsakis, 1991; Tramper et al
.,
1993;
Chalmers, 1994) and will not be covered here except to
signal some concrete consequences for bioreactor con-
figuration: (a) media additives such as Pluronic F-68
and other polymers or serum ingredients are effective
in preserving high viability in agitated and bubble-
aerated vessels, primarily by physically preventing the
adhesion of cells to the surfaces of bubbles and thus
avoiding cell death by the tremendous local forces on
rupturing bubbles in gas-liquid interfaces, (b) estab-
lishing a judicious regime of air bubble diameters to
diminish bubble coalescence is beneficial for cell via-
bility in directly sparged stirred or airlift bioreactor
systems, (c) physical separation of cells and air bub-
bles or use of bubble-free aeration in reactor designs
(split-flow airlift, membrane-oxygenated stirred tank,
etc) protects cells from air bubble-induced damage and
(d) a ‘killing volume’ or equivalent volume of liquid
surrounding a bubble before bursting is directly pro-
portional to the first-order death constant of the cells,
can be calculated from geometric and operational para-
meters for a given cultivation system in order to design
optimally bubble columns or airlift reactors, and may
lead to the selection of the aspect (height to diameter)
ratio as a key to scale-up.
In order to maximize productivity, high cell densi-
ty cultures should be an obvious answer to bioreactor
design, in conjunction with the appropriate choice of
operation pattern, i.e., batch, repeated (fed-)batch or
continuous (e.g. perfusion) process. However, higher
cell densities do not necessarily lead to correspond-
ingly higher virus or recombinant protein production.
Insect cells may exhibit a type of contact inhibition
with respect to susceptibility to baculovirus infection
and, consequently, affect adversely viral and protein
yield (Wood et al
.,
1982; Wickham and Nemerow,
1993). A general observation in cultured insect cells
is that there is an optimal range of cell density for
infection, and that infection at cell densities above this
critical range leads to a decline in productivity per cell
(Caron et al
.,
1990; Lindsay and Betenbaugh, 1992;
Wickham et al
.,
1992; Hensler and Agathos, 1994).
This phenomenon is currently thought to be due pos-
sibly to depletion of medium nutrients (glucose, glu-
tamine, other amino acids and growth factors) or of
oxygen or to the accumulation of inhibitory metabolic
byproducts (lactate, ammonia, or uric acid) or to the
relative prevalence of cells in the various phases of the
cell cycle, rather than to contact inhibition (Caron et
al
.,
1990; Lindsay and Betenbaugh, 1992; Zhang et
al
.,
1993, 1994b; Kioukia et al., 1995).
Confirmation of the underlying causes for this con-
flict between cell density and intrinsic productivity has
led recently to nutritional control (feeding) strategies
in bioreactor-based insect cell process, that are briefly
reviewed at a later section of this article.
Parameters affecting insect cell bioreactor
operation
Given our still incomplete knowledge of insect cell
behavior in culture, it is important to identify a rela-