360 STATISTICAL METHODS OF GEOPHYSICAL DATA PROCESSING
11.8 Examples of the Recovery of the Local Inhomogeneity
Parameters by the Diffraction Tomography Method
Let us consider the results of the numerical simulation on the recovery of the param-
eters of local inhomogeneities by the diffraction tomography method. The resolution
of the diffraction tomography is demonstrated by the recovery results of a bulk of
inhomogeneities with sizes much smaller of the wavelength, which are placed in the
3-D uniform reference medium (Troyan and Ryzhikov, 1994, 1995). The results of
the recovery of the parameters of local inhomogeneities of a complex shape and
the sizes comparable with the wavelength (Kiselev and Troyan, 1998) allows us to
estimate the errors sequent from the Born approximation, which is used here to
linearize the inverse problem solution.
11.8.1 An estimation of the resolution
Let us consider the numerical experiments (Troyan and Ryzhikov, 1994, 1995), for
the of the resolution of the diffraction tomography method under the simply ordered
array of three-component seismometers. The reference medium is assumed to be
infinite and uniform. The incident wave field is a plane p-wave with a definite time
shape and a given normal vector to the wave front. The resolution is tested on a
regular set of the point diffractors. The synthetic seismograms (direct problem solu-
tion) are solved under the Born approximation. The geometry of such experiments
is represented at Fig. 11.3. All results are normalized on a dominant wavelength λ
of the incident p-wave in the reference medium (v
p
0
=4000 m/s, v
s
0
=2000 m/s).
The velocity of the p-wave inside diffractors is equal to 3300 m/s. The recovery of
the set of diffractors is implemented by the processing of the several experiments
with the various normal to the wave front and the various signal shape. The recov-
ery consists in the estimation of the parameter w = (v
p
0
/v
p
−1). In the experiment
the following normal vectors are used: n
0
, n
1
and n
2
. The next equalities are valid
(n
0
, e
z
) = 1, (n
1
, e
x
) =
√
2/2, (n
2
, e
x
) =
√
2/2, where e
z
and e
x
are unit vectors,
directed along z and x axis respectively. For the simulation of the real seismic
data the white noise with the zero mathematical expectation and the variance σ
is added.
The resolution of the diffraction tomography method is investigated depend-
ing on the distance between receivers, the type of the incident wave, noise
level.
At Fig. 11.4 the results of the recovery for distances between receivers d = 0, 5
λ, d = 3 λ and d = 5 λ are represented. The noise level is 5 %. Two incident plane
waves are used for the calculation of the synthetic seismogram. The best recovery
is obtained for the case of d = 3 λ , Fig. 11.4(b). The better recovery is observed
in the case of two plane incident waves in comparison with one plane wave. The
applied algorithm can be used for the case of the noise level 20 %.