BIBLIOGRAPHICAL ESSAYS 839
light on what government officials at and below the cabinet level believed in,
hoped to achieve, and did achieve. Among those surviving are
Cheng-fu kung-pao
(Government gazette), the gazettes of many of the ministries, those of the 1916-
17 House and Senate, and those of such miscellaneous organizations as the
1925 Reconstruction Conference. In addition, the government published the
quarterly
Chih-yuan
lu (Register of officials), through which researchers can
trace continuity and change in higher bureaucratic appointments.
Diplomatic archives represent another under-used source. Whether one
interprets the diplomacy of the early republic in conventional terms as a disaster
for China, or more positively as in this chapter, the story of how the Chinese
and the powers conducted themselves needs to be looked at more closely. The
only modern work on the subject is Sow-theng Leong,
Sino-Soviet diplomatic
relations,
1917-26. Leong's bibliography lists the published and archival Chinese
Foreign Ministry documents he consulted. For the Ministry's collection on
Sino-Japanese relations, see Kuo T'ing-yee, comp. and J. W. Morley, ed.
Sino-Japanese
relations, 1862-1927: a checklist of the
Chinese Foreign
Ministry Archives,
with a useful glossary of Chinese, Japanese and Korean names. American,
British and Japanese diplomatic materials, in both published and archival form,
were similarly important; for a brief description of each see Andrew J. Nathan,
Modern China, 1840-19/2: an introduction to sources and
research
aids. Diplomatic
reports are of course important for their information on internal Chinese politics.
An understanding of Peking politics requires work on related topics in
intellectual, economic and social history. So far, we know little about the
specific content of the debates over constitutional provisions that went on from
the late Ch'ing into the Nanking decade and beyond. This topic can be studied
further in government gazettes, newspapers and intellectual journals such as
Tung-fang
tsa-chih.
Meanwhile, thanks to the work of Chang P'eng-yuan (in
particular his Li-hsien p'ai yii Hsin-hai ko-ming, Liang Ch'i-ch'ao yii Ch'ing-chi ho-
ming, and Liang Ch'i-ch'ao yu min-kuo
cheng-chih)
and others like Chang Yii-fa,
we know a good deal about the basic rationale for constitutionalism and the
social and political nature of the forces promoting it.
Banking and government finance is another important topic that needs
study. Chia Shih-i's compendious Min-kuo
ts'ai-cheng
shih provides materials
whose import has yet to be fully analysed; Frank Tamagna,
Banking
and finance
in China, was an early effort that needs a successor. Numerous more or less
contemporary Japanese analyses are important for this subject. These include
Shina kin'yu jijo and Kagawa Shun'ichiro,
Senso shihon
ron; others are listed in
Skinner, Modern Chinese society; John King Fairbank et al. Japanese studies of
modern China; and Noriko Kamachi et al. Japanese studies of modern China since
19}}.
The Chinese banking magazines, Yin-hang
chou-pao
and Yin-hangyueh-k'an,
are also revealing.
To both foreign scholars and Chinese participants, factionalism is an im-
portant theme in modern Chinese history. Nathan,
Peking
politics,
provides one
analysis of what factionalism was and how it worked; slightly different in-
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008