and
The two parameters a
i
and b
i
in Equation 15-103 were previously defined
by Equations 15-71 and 15-72.
The major drawback in the SRK EOS is that the critical compressibili-
ty factor takes on the unrealistic universal critical compressibility of
0.333 for all substances. Consequently, the molar volumes are typically
overestimated and, hence, densities are underestimated.
Peneloux et al. (1982) developed a procedure for improving the volu-
metric predictions of the SRK EOS by introducing a volume correction
parameter c
i
into the equation. This third parameter does not change the
vapor-liquid equilibrium conditions determined by the unmodified SRK
equation, i.e., the equilibrium ratio K
i
, but it modifies the liquid and gas
volumes. The proposed methodology, known as the volume translation
method, uses the following expressions:
where V
L
= uncorrected liquid molar volume, i.e., V
L
= Z
L
RT/p,
ft
3
/mol
V
v
= uncorrected gas molar volume V
v
= Z
v
RT/p, ft
3
/mol
V
L
corr
= corrected liquid molar volume, ft
3
/mol
V
v
corr
= corrected gas molar volume, ft
3
/mol
x
i
= mole fraction of component i in the liquid phase
y
i
= mole fraction of component i in the gas phase
The authors proposed six different schemes for calculating the correc-
tion factor c
i
for each component. For petroleum fluids and heavy hydro-
carbons, Peneloux and coworkers suggested that the best correlating
parameter for the correction factor c
i
is the Rackett compressibility factor
Z
RA
. The correction factor is then defined mathematically by the follow-
ing relationship:
cZTp
iRAcici
=−
(
)
(
)
4 43797878 0 29441..
15 -106
VV yc
corr
vv
ii
i
=−
(
)
(
)
∑
15 -105
VV xc
corr
LL
ii
i
=−
(
)
(
)
∑
15 -104
ε
i
i
i
a
b
=
(
)
0 480453.
15 -103
1110 Reservoir Engineering Handbook
Reservoir Eng Hndbk Ch 15 2001-10-25 17:41 Page 1110