74 75
the serious crisis of the 1990s [3, pp 45-50]. Nursultan Nazarbayev
once said that “having chosen the model of a presidential republic,
we have brought the country out of the post-Soviet economic and
political chaos” [4, p 8]. However, objective needs for further de-
velopment demanded the country’s government actively search for
an effi cient model for the state and political system, including the
fi nal choice of a presidential or parliamentary form of government,
a solution to the problem of the division of branches of power and
the decentralisation of power. On 16 May 2007, speaking at a joint
session of parliament’s chambers, the president proposed his own
vision of this model: “The need to build Kazakh statehood and a
market economy from scratch and develop a liberal political system
for the fi rst time in our history demanded the bold consolidation of
society. That is why I assumed all responsibility for what is taking
place in the country and this was a must. However, today, when all
important parameters of the process of modernising the country
have been defi ned and we realise that it is irreversible, there is
sense in redistributing some duties and responsibilities between the
president and parliament. I propose to choose a way of changing the
constitution in which the country remains presidential but with the
considerable expansion of parliament’s powers. This will transform
our country’s model of government from presidential into presiden-
tial-parliamentary.” [4. p 11]
Since 2007, when the country’s constitution was amended, the
institution of presidency has preserved its role as an element stabilis-
ing the system, concentrating the efforts of elite groups on solving
important political problems, as was the case, for example in the
mid-1990s (the economic crisis) or at the beginning of the 2000s (the
elites crisis) [5, 10]. Analysts point to the fact that “in Kazakhstan the
presidential form of government is one of the fundamental organisa-
tional conditions for the stability of the entire political system of the
country. The presidential power in Kazakhstan embodies not only
the strength of government but also, not least, the basis on which the
mechanisms of self-regulation of branches of power develop and their
organic integration into the structure of public life and deep strata of
social culture, inherent to Kazakh society” [1].
This was all prompted by the consensus nature of the political
course, adopted by the Kazakh president, which has always helped
mobilise and consolidate political and economic elites during reforms
that were crucial for the country. Another advantage of the head of
state’s policy was the ability to conduct large-scale reforms with
minimum confl ict, which, in turn, demanded the consolidation of
efforts in solving these. Kazakh society was consolidated around the
strong and dynamic leader with a clear vision of prospects of further
development. The unity and stability achieved under the leadership
of President Nazarbayev was a deliberate political decision taken
by the majority of the country’s population, repeatedly confi rmed in
elections, including the presidential election in 2005
*
and the par-
liamentary election in 2007
**
. As a result, in this case stability acts
as an en-masse demand and the policy of stability, pursued by Mr
Nazarbayev, meets the people’s expectations [5, p 11].
When considering the fi rst president’s role in Kazakhstan’s mod-
ern history, it is necessary to note the special role personalities play
in the political process in modern Kazakhstan and the post-Soviet
space in general. It is no great exaggeration to say that the history of
the establishment of independent Kazakhstan’s statehood was fully
personifi ed in and revolved around one person. Successes achieved
during the years of independence, including Kazakhstan’s current
leadership in Central Asia, are largely linked to Mr Nazarbayev’s
personality. It is no accident that Russian experts on Kazakhstan and
Central Asia consider Kazakhstan’s phenomenon inseparably from
the Nazarbayev factor, a politician on a global scale who has had
successful experience in economic and social reforms: Kazakhstan’s
indisputable success is not only and not that much about oil or the
elements of the periodical table hidden in the depths of the steppe.
In short, Kazakhstan under Mr Nazarbayev has to a greater extent
managed to become a fully-fl edged state than Georgia under Eduard
Shevardnadze, Ukraine under Leonid Kuchma or Kyrgyzstan under
*
On 4 December 2005, Nursultan Nazarbayev was re-elected president of Kazakhstan with
91.15% of the vote.
**
On 18 August 2007, the president’s Nur Otan party won a vast majority in the parliamentary
and local elections.
Kazakhstan today
Chapter 2. Domestic Policy