INTRODUCTION
A historian’s work is grounded in, and bounded by, the sources available and with-
out them we would be authors of myth. But understanding history is not as
straightforward as it might appear – for it is not just the sum of countless docu-
ments, written, visual, and oral. It involves an act of interpretation: extracting
meaning from piles of paper, or ruined buildings or even the fairy tales passed
from one generation to another. Every historical document has a story to tell – let-
ters, diaries, and memoirs – even laundry lists reveal something about the time in
which they were produced. But no document reveals its secrets willingly – it must
be interrogated. Who wrote it? When, and why, was the document written? What
was the author’s perspective? An account of Henry VIII’s break with the Roman
Catholic church written by a committed Protestant, for example, would probably
look very different from that produced by a devout Catholic. How might an author’s
social status, or ethnicity, or gender affect his or her views? What can the form of
a particular document tell us? Down to the 1650s, for instance, the records of the
common law courts in England were kept in Norman French – a language that
existed only in the minds of lawyers and their clerks. Why was this so? Some would
argue that this peculiarity reveals something about the conservative nature of
English law. Others might claim that it reveals a self-interested determination on the
part of lawyers to mystify the public, making laymen dependent upon their exper-
tise. When the clerk of the Privy Council wrote up the minutes of its meetings, he
always began with a list of those who attended, noted in strict order of rank, from
the sovereign down to the untitled office holders and bureaucrats with council
seats. The attendance list of a particular meeting of the council might say impor-
tant things about the making of policy – who was present when a major decision
was taken, for example. But the form of the document itself reveals something
about the role of status and hierarchy in early modern England.
No single document ever tells the full story: it is often difficult to reconcile con-
flicting accounts or to fill in the blank spaces in the record. Readers must approach
the sources with a critical eye as well as an understanding of the context in which
those sources were produced. This collection focuses upon government and pol-
itics in early modern England – a period of rapid, and often violent, political
change. During these two centuries England travelled a path – one with more than
1