Kanevski L. Learning potentials of gifted students // Roeper review. — 1995. —
Vol. 17, №3. - P. 157-163.
Kaplan S. Nontraditional screening. A process to uncover the potential of students
from underrepresented populations / S. Kaplan, E. Rodrigues, V. Siegel // Communi-
cator. California association forthe gifted. — 2000. — Vol. 31, № 2. — P. 20—21.
Khatena J. Gifted: challenge and response for education. — ITASCA, IL: Pe-
acock, 1992.
Khatena J. Enhancing of gifted children: a guide for parents and teachers. —
Cresskill: Mampton Press, 2000.
Kaufman F. A. What educators can learn from gifted adults? // F. J. Monks, W. A.
M. Peters (Eds.). Talent forthe future. — Assen: Van Gorcum, 1992. — P. 37—44.
Kuhl J. Action control: The maintenance of motivational states // F. Halish,
J. Kuhl (Eds.) Motivation, intention and action. — Berlin, 1985. — P. 279—292.
Lee-Corbin H. Factors influencing success or under-achievement of able
child / H. Lee-Corbin, R. Evans// Maximizing potential: lengthening and stren-
gthening our stride: Proceedings of the 1Г World conference of gifted and talen-
ted children. - Hong Kong, 1997. — R 376—382.
Lehwald G. Zur Diagnostik des Erkenntnisstrebens bei Schulern. — Berlin-
Volk und Wissen, 1985.
Limont W. Model of the structure of visual art abilities // Competence ahd
responsibility / Ed. by E. A. Hany, K. A. Heller. — Seattle, 1993. — P. 88—91.
Lubinski D. The study of mathematically precocious youth: the first three de-
cades of a planned 50-year study of intellectual talent / D. Lubinski, C. P. Benbow
// R. F. Subotnik, K. D. Arnold (Eds.). Beyond Terman: contemporary longitudi-
nal studies of giftedness and talent. — Norwood, 1994. — P. 255—281.
Lupart J. L. The hidden gifted: current state of knowledge and future research
directions//F.J. Monks, W A. Peters (Eds.). Talent forthe future. —Assen: Van
Gorcum, 1992. - P. 177—190.
Marland S. P. Education of the gifted and talented / Report to the Subcom-
mittee on education, Committee on labor and public welfare, US Senate. — Was-
hington, DC: U.S. Government printing office, 1972.
McCabe M. P. Influence of creativity and intelligence on academic perfor-
mance // Journal of creative behavior. — 1991. — Vol. 25 (2). — P. 116—122.
McGuire I. Gifted learning disabled students' knowledge of metacognitive reading
strategies /1. McGuire, C. Yewchuk // Nurturing talent, individual needs and sociala-
bility: The 4
Л
conference of ECHA. — Assen: Van Gorcum, 1995. — P. 239—251.
Mednick S. A. The associative basis of creativity / Psychological review. —
1962. - Vol. 69. - P. 220-232.
Meeting the challenge: A guidebook for teaching gifted students. — Califor-
nia association for the gifted. — California, 1996.
Mendaglio S. Gifted / ADHD case illustrations of coexisting conditions /
S. Mendaglio, P. Istvanffy, B. Hemstock//Maximizing potential: lengthening and
strengthening our stride: Proceedings of the 11
01
World conference of gifted and ta-
lented children. - Hong Kong, 1997. - P. 527—531.
* Milgram R. M. Creative thinking and creative performance in adolescents as a
predictors of creative attainments in adults: a follow-up study after 18 years /
360
R. M. Milgram, E. Hong // R. F. Subotnik, K. D. Arnold. Beyond Terman: contem-
porary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent. — Norwood, 1994. — P. 212—228.
Monks F. J. Development of gifted children: The issue of identification and
programming // F. J. Monks, W. A. M. Peters (Eds.). Talent forthe future. — As-
sen: Van Gorcum, 1992. - P. 191-202.
Montgomery D. Social abilities in highly able disabled learners and the cones-
quences for remediation // Nurturing talent, individual needs and socialability:
The 4
,h
conference of ECHA. - Assen: Van Gorcum, 1995. - P. 226-238.
Mooij T. Interactional multi-levet theory to predict (under) achievement of a
gifted child // Talent for the future / Ed. by F. J. Monks, W A. V Peters. — Assen,
1992. - P. 203-212.
Moon S. M. The program for academic and creative enrichment (PACE): a
follow-up study ten years later / S. M. Moon, J. F. Feldhusen // R. F. Subotnik,
K. D. Arnold (Eds.). Beyond Terman: contemporary longitudinal studies of
gif-
tedness and talent. — Norwood, 1994. — P. 375—400.
Oden M. The fulfillment of promise: 40-year follow-up of the Terman gifted
group // Genetic psychology monographs. 77. — 1968. — R 3—93.
Oswald W. D. Der Zahlen-Verbindungs-Test (ZVT) / W. D. Oswald, E. Roth. —
Gottingen: Hogrefe, 1978.
Parker W. D. Perfectionism and the gifted / W. D. Parker, К. K. Adkins //
Roeper review. — 1995. - Vol.17, № 3. - P. 173-176.
Perleth Ch. The structure of cognitive abilities in highly and moderately gifted
young people / Ch. Perleth, K. Steffens // European journal for high ability. —
1990. - Vol. 1, №. 0. - P. 76-84.
Perleth Ch. The Munich longitudinal study of giftedness / Ch. Perleth,
K. A. Heller // R. F. Subotnik, K. D. Arnold (Eds.). Beyond Terman: contempora-
ry longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent. — Norwood, 1994. — P. 77—114.
Raven J. C. A manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary tests /
J. C. Raven, J. H. Court, J. Raven. — London: H.K. Lewis & Co. Ltd, 1988.
Reis S. M. Case studies of high ability students with learning disabilities who
have achieved / S. M. Reis, T. Neu, J. McGuire // Exceptional children. —
1997. - Vol. 63, № 4. - P. 463-479.
Renzulli J. S. What makes giftendness? Reexamining a definition // Phi Delta
Kappan. - 1978. - Vol. 60. - P. 180-184, 261.
Renzulli J- S. The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model
for creative productivity // R. I. Sternberg, J. E. Davidson. Conceptions of Gifted-
ness. — Cambridge: Cambridge Universcity Press, 1986. — P. 53—92 (332—357).
Renzulli J. S. A general theory for the development of creative productivity in
young people // F. J. Monks, W A. M. Peters (Eds.). Talent for the future. — As-
sen, 1992.-P. 51-72.
Renzulli J. S. What is the thing called giftedness, and how do we develop it?
A twenty-five year perspective // Journal for the education of the Gifted. —
1999. - Vol. 23, № 1. -
P.
3-54.
Richert S. E. Identification of children in the United States: the need for plu-
ralistic assessment // Roeper review. — 1985. — Vol. 8, № 2. — P. 68—72.
361