BSCCO high-T
c
superconducting films 195
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40
1
2
43X
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2011
only in the 2201 phase. The value
ν
= 1 corresponds to the doping state for which
there is the largest T interval where there is a linear variation of R(T) and is
obtained for a doping level (p = 0.19) close to optimal doping (p = 0.16), but in
the overdoped side (Oh et al., 2005). For p < 0.19 and in the underdoped side, the
value of
ν
of the law:
ρ
ab
(T) =
ρ
0
+ bT
ν
becomes less than one.
Let us analyse more precisely the evolution of the resistivity through the phase
diagram (T, p). In the overdoped side, it appeared that one can determine a
temperature T** above which
ρ
ab
(T) is linear and below which R(T) becomes
superlinear (positive curvature). Conjugated transport and ARPES experiments
on similar 2212 thin films at various doping states have shown that this crossover
temperature T**, which increases with increasing doping, separates a coherent
region, below T**, where a bilayer splitting is observed in the ARPES spectra,
from an incoherent one above T**, without bilayer splitting (Kaminski et al.,
2003, and fig. 5 of this reference).
In the underdoped side, a
ρ
ab
(T) curve comprises a high T linear part above a
temperature T* while below T* the decrease of
ρ
ab
(T) becomes more rapid and
sublinear (negative curvature), the signature of a rapid reduction of the inelastic
scattering rate of the electrons. The temperature, T*, higher for lower doping levels,
is considered as the temperature below which the pseudogap opens (Ito
et al., 1993). In this region, ARPES spectroscopy shows a partial destruction of the
Fermi surface near the nodal regions (Norman et al., 1998). Low energy-excitations
occupy disconnected segments called Fermi arcs. By ARPES studies on underdoped
2212, it was reported that the Fermi arc length decreases linearly vs T/T*(p), where
p is the hole content, and extrapolates to zero as T goes to zero, suggesting that the
state at T = 0 is a nodal liquid (Kanigel et al., 2006). When the superconducting
transition occurs, there is an abrupt collapse from a finite arc length which lies on
the scaling line to a point node below T
c
, (Kanigel et al., 2007, see Fig. 5.4). The
collapse of the Fermi arc has the same width as the resistive transition. Considering
the resistive transition at various doping, a scaling law of the temperature dependent
part of the resistivity, (
ρ
ab
(T) −
ρ
0
)/b as function of T/T* has also been reported
(Fig. 5.11 and Konstantinovic et al., 2000a). This demonstrates that the important
energy scale in this region is T*, while in the superconducting fluctuative region,
close to T
c
, the corresponding decrease of the resistivivity scales with T/T
c
. However,
important pending questions concern the origin of the pseudogap and the nature of
the temperature T*: is it a crossover or a transition temperature? By the use of
circularly polarized photons and 2212 thin films in different doping states,
underdoped and overdoped, it was shown by ARPES that, below T*, left-circularly
polarized photons give a different photocurrent than right circularly polarized ones
(Kaminski et al., 2002). This observation, which demonstrates that time reversal
symmetry is spontaneously broken below T*, appears to indicate a phase transition
at T*. This result has been highly discussed since 2002. The variation with doping
of the characteristic temperatures T
c
, T*, T** allows us to establish the phase
diagram (T, doping) (Fig. 5.12). Except for the region to the right below the T**line,